/
ttmark.tex
892 lines (744 loc) · 33.3 KB
/
ttmark.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
\documentclass[11pt, a4paper, oneside]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[textsize=footnotesize,textwidth=3cm]{todonotes}
\usepackage[parfill]{parskip} % Begin paragraphs with an empty line rather than an indent
\newcommand{\Lam}{\Lambda}
\newcommand{\Lamc}{{\bar{\Lambda}}}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\newtheorem{thm}{Theorem}
\newtheorem{theorem}[thm]{Theorem}
\newtheorem{conj}[thm]{Conjecture}
\newtheorem{conjecture}[thm]{Conjecture}
\newtheorem{cor}[thm]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{corollary}[thm]{Corollary}
\newtheorem{lem}[thm]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{lemma}[thm]{Lemma}
\newtheorem{prop}[thm]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{proposition}[thm]{Proposition}
\newtheorem{ax}{Axiom}
\newtheorem{axiom}{Axiom}
\newtheorem{claim}{Claim}
\theoremstyle{definition}
\newtheorem{defn}{Definition}
\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
\newtheorem{ex}{Example}
\newtheorem{example}{Example}
\theoremstyle{remark}
\newtheorem{notation}{Notation}
\newtheorem{remark}{Remark}
\newtheorem{rem}{Remark}
\PassOptionsToPackage{override}{xcolor} % Beamer option
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{subfig}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsfonts,amssymb}
\usepackage{dsfont}
\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}
\usepackage{enumerate,xspace,threeparttable}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{algorithmic}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{wrapfig}
\usepackage{translator}
\providecommand{\ie}{i.e.\ }
\providecommand{\qr}{\eqref}
\renewcommand{\d}{\,d}
\providecommand{\dd}[2]{\dfrac{d#1}{d#2}}
\providecommand{\qtext}[1]{\quad\text{#1 }\quad}
\providecommand{\RR}{\mathbb{R}}
\providecommand{\CC}{\mathbb{C}}
\providecommand{\TT}{\mathbb{T}}
\providecommand{\ZZ}{\mathbb{Z}}
\providecommand{\QQ}{\mathbb{Q}}
\providecommand{\NN}{\mathbb{N}}
\providecommand{\VV}{\mathbb{V}}
\providecommand{\PP}{\mathsf{P}}
\providecommand{\EE}{\mathsf{E}}
\providecommand{\BB}{\mathbb{B}}
\renewcommand{\SS}{\mathbb{S}}
\providecommand{\CF}{\mathscr{F}}
\providecommand{\CB}{\mathscr{B}}
\providecommand{\CA}{\mathscr{A}}
\providecommand{\CR}{\mathscr{R}}
\providecommand{\CH}{\mathscr{H}}
\providecommand{\CM}{\mathscr{M}}
\providecommand{\CT}{\mathscr{T}}
\providecommand{\mfrak}{\mathfrak}
\providecommand{\mscr}{\mathscr}
\providecommand{\mc}{\mathcal}
\providecommand{\mb}{\mathbf}
\providecommand{\bs}{\boldsymbol}
\providecommand{\mbb}{\mathbb}
\providecommand{\ms}{\mathsf}
\providecommand{\vv}[2]{\ensuremath{\overrightarrow{#1#2}}} % vector
\providecommand{\opn}{\operatorname}
\providecommand{\ol}{\overline}
\def\ii#1{^{(#1)}}
\providecommand{\E}{\mathsf{E}}
\renewcommand{\P}{\mathsf{P}}
\renewcommand{\Pr}[1]{\P\left(#1\right)}
\providecommand{\Ex}[1]{\E(#1)}
\providecommand{\Var}{\opn{Var}}
\providecommand{\var}{\opn{var}}
\providecommand{\Cov}{\opn{Cov}}
\providecommand{\sign}{\opn{sign}}
\providecommand{\diag}{\opn{diag}}
\providecommand{\msf}{\mathsf}
\providecommand{\ett}{\mathsf{1}}
\providecommand{\Ordo}[1]{{O(#1)}}
\providecommand{\ordo}[1]{{o(#1)}}
\providecommand{\OrdoOmega}[1]{{\varOmega(#1)}}
\providecommand{\OrdoTheta}[1]{\ensuremath{\Theta(#1)}}
\providecommand{\ordoomega}[1]{\ensuremath{\omega(#1)}}
\providecommand{\e}{\epsilon}
\providecommand{\tl}{\tilde}
\providecommand{\g}{\gamma}
\providecommand{\w}{\omega}
\providecommand{\C}{C}
\providecommand{\scp}[2]{\ensuremath{\left\langle#1,#2\right\rangle}}
\providecommand{\bmat}[1]{\begin{bmatrix} #1 \end{bmatrix}}
\providecommand{\T}{^{\!\mathrm{T}}}
\providecommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
\renewcommand{\L}{\mathscr{L}}
\def\Ex#1{\EE\left[#1\right]}
\def\dom{\opn{dom}}
\def\X{\mscr X}
\def\T{\opn{\msf{T}}}
\def\F{\mscr F}
\def\scp#1#2{\left\langle #1 , #2 \right\rangle}
\usepackage{biblatex}
%\addbibresource{main.bib}
\title{Existence for an eigenfunction for the critical phase of the Dyson model}
\author{Anders Johansson, Anders \"Oberg, Mark Pollicott, \\ and Evgeny Verbitskiy}
\date{}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\def\h{h}
\section{Introduction}\noindent
It is well-known that there exists a continuous and strictly positive
eigenfunction $h$ for any transfer operator defined on a symbolic shift space
with a finite number of symbols such that the potential has summable variations.
Here we prove the existence of an eigenfunction for the important special class
of Dyson potentials close to the critical phase, when the potential does not
satisfy the condition of summable variations.
More precisely, let $T$ be the left shift on the space $X_+=S^{{\mathbb Z}_+}$,
where $S$ is a finite set. Define a transfer operator ${\mathcal L}$ on
continuous functions $f$ by
\begin{equation}\label{trans} {\mathcal L} f(x)= \sum_{y\in T^{-1}x}
e^{\phi(y)}f(y),
\end{equation}
where $\phi$ is a continuous potential. Since $X_+$ is a compact space, it
follows automatically from the Schauder--Tychonoff theorem that the dual
${\mathcal L}^*$, restricted to the probability measures, has an eigenmeasure
$\nu$: ${\mathcal L}^* \mu=\lambda \nu$, for some $\lambda>0$. The existence of
a continuous eigenfunction $h$ such that ${\mathcal L}h=\lambda h$, $\lambda>0$,
is however not automatic for any continuous potential $\phi$. If one assumes
summable variations of $\phi$,
\begin{equation}\label{sum}
\sum_{n=1}^\infty \var_n (\phi)<\infty,
\end{equation}
where $\var_n(\phi)=\sup_{x\sim_n y}|\phi(x)-\phi(y)|$ ($x\sim_n y$ means that
$x$ and $y$ coincide in the first $n$ entries), then existence of a continuous
eigenfunction follows from the typical ``cone-argument'' used in {\em e.g.},
Walters \cite{waltersConvergenceRuelleOperator2001}, which to date is the only
known method for providing the existence of an eigenfunction.
If $\mu$ is the equilibrium measure (translation invariant Gibbs measure) for
the continuous potential $\psi:X\to X$, where $X=S^{\mathbb Z}$, then (with
slight abuse of notation) $\mu$ is recovered on $X_+$ as the $g$-measure for the
probability potential
\begin{equation}\label{g}
g(x)= \frac{h(x) e^{\phi(y)}}{\lambda h(Tx)}.
\end{equation}
For a transfer operator ${\mathcal L}_g$, defined on continuous functions $f$ by
\begin{equation} {\mathcal L}_g f(x)=\sum_{y\in T^{-1}x} g(y) f(y)
\end{equation}
we have ${\mathcal L}_g^*\mu=\mu$, and also the invariance $\mu\circ
T^{-1}=\mu$.
More precisely, if
$$\theta(x_0, x_1,\ldots)=\beta \sum_{j=1}^\infty \frac{x_j}{j^\alpha},$$
then we may define the two-sided Dyson potential $\psi$ as
$$\psi(x)=\sum_{k=-\infty}^\infty x_k \theta(T^k x).$$
A one-sided version can be defined as
$$\phi(x)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty x_k \theta (T^k x).$$
We then have for $\alpha>2$
$$\mu_{|{\mathcal F}_{[0,\infty)}}= h\nu,$$
where $\mu$ is the two-sided translation invariant Gibbs measure (the
equilibrium measure) and where ${\mathcal L}^*\nu=\lambda \nu$, and $h>0$ is a
H\"older continuous eigenfunction. We are interested in the boundary case
$\alpha=2$, when there exists a unique equilibrium measure for $\psi$ for
$\beta<\beta_c$. In this case the summable variations condition is not satisfied
for neither $\psi$ nor $\phi$; we may have multiple eigenmeasures for
${\mathcal L}^*$. In this context we have $\var_n(\phi)=O(\frac{1}{n})$ and it
is not clear if there exists an eigenfunction even in the cases we have a unique
equilibrium measure, such as in the case of the Berbee condition
(\cite{berbeeUniquenessGibbsMeasures1989}) Berbee proved that there exists a
unique equlibrium measure whenever
\begin{equation}\label{berbee}
\sum_{n=1}^\infty e^{-r_1-r_2-\cdots-r_n}=\infty,
\end{equation}
where $r_n=\var_n \log \psi$, or if $r_n=\var_n \log \phi$. Berbee's condition
is very robust in the sense that it gives uniqueness for both the two-sided and
one-sided potentials, whereas square summable variations (see
\cite{johanssonSquareSummabilityVariations2003}) only gives a unique
$g$-measure, ${\mathcal L}_g^* \mu=\mu$. Since we have proved in
\cite{johanssonPhaseTransitionsLongrange2017}
that for all $\epsilon>0$ we can find a one-sided potential $\phi$ with
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty (\var_n \phi)^{1+\epsilon}<\infty$$
such that ${\mathcal L}^* \nu=\lambda \nu$ has multiple solutions $\nu$, it
seems that the existence of a at least a very regular eigenfunction of
${\mathcal L}$ would be in doubt in view of uniqueness of a $g$-measure
corresponding to multiple one-sided Gibbs measures.
Here we prove that if the inverse critical temperature is small enough, close to
the critical phase, then we still have an eigenfunction of ${\mathcal L}$.
\begin{thm}\label{main} Let $\mu$ be the Gibbs equilibrium measure with respect
to the Dyson potential $\phi$ and let $\nu$ be the one-sided Gibbs measure,
i.e., ${\mathcal L}^*\mu=\lambda \mu$. Define
$$h_n(x)=\frac{\mu[x_0,\ldots x_n]}{\nu[x_0,\ldots, x_n},$$
and consider the measurable function $h(x)=\lim_{n\to \infty}h_n(x)$. If
$\beta<\beta_c$, then $h$ is a continuous function on $X_+$, and which is also
an eigenfunction of ${\mathcal L}$.
\end{thm}
We conjecture that there exists a continuous eigenfunction for a potential
$\phi$ that satisfies Berbee's condition \eqref{berbee}.
\subsection{The random cluster model for ferromagnetic Ising spin models}
\def\SI{\{\pm1\}}
\def\SB{\{0,1\}}
\def\b{b}
\def\XI#1{\xi\left(#1\right)}
\def\t{G}
Given a finite graph $(V,E)$ and edge probabilities $p:E\to[0,1]$, $ij\mapsto p_{ij}$, the
Bernoulli graph model $\xi = \xi_p$ is a probability on the set of spanning subgraphs
$\t\subset E$ viewed as functions $\t:E\to\{0,1\}$ such that the probability of each
$\t\in\{0,1\}^E$ is given by
\[ \xi(\t) = p^\t(1-p)^{1-\t} := \prod_{ij}\, p_{ij}^{\t_{ij}}\cdot
(1-p_{ij})^{1-\t_{ij}}. \]
The expectation of a function $f(\t)$, $\t\in\SI^V$,
with respect to $\xi$ is written $\XI(f(\t))$, i.e.\
\(\XI(f) = \sum_{\t} \xi(\t)\cdot f(\t)\).
An Ising spin vector on $G$ is a vector $x\in\SI^V$ indexed by vertices in $G$.
Consider a potential of the form
\[ H(x) = \beta \sum_{ij\in E} J_{ij} x_i x_j, \] where $J_{ij}\geq 0$ gives the
interaction strength along edge $ij\in E$. The corresponding (ferromagnetic)
Ising model on $G$ is the probability measure $\mu$ where the probability of
$x\in \SI^V$ is given by
\[ \mu(x) = \frac 1{Z} e^{-H(x)}. \]
The \emph{random cluster model} relates the Ising model with a Bernoulli random
graph model as follows: Consider a $\t$ having Bernoulli distribution
$\xi=\xi_p$, where the edge probabilities are
\[ p_{ij} = 1 - e^{-\beta J_{ij}} \quad \text{for $ij\in E$}\] and a uniformly
chosen spin configuration $x\in\SI^V$, i.e.\ where the spins $x_i$ are chosen
from $\SI$ according to a fair coin. We say that $x\in \SI^V$ and $\t\in\SB^E$
are \emph{compatible} if no path in the graph $\t$ connects a spin $x_i=+1$ with
a spin $x_j=-1$, $i\not=j$. We write $\b(\t,x)$ to indicate the event that $\t$
and $x$ are compatible. The joint distribution of $x$ and $\t$ \emph{conditioned}
on the event that they are compatible is what is named the random cluster model
$\rho(x,\t)$. One readily verifies that the marginal distribution of $x$ equals the
Ising model on $\SI^V$ with potential $H$ as above. The marginal distribution of
$\t$ is given by
\[
\tl\xi(\t) = \frac{2^{\omega(\t)}\xi(\t)}{\xi(2^{\omega(\t)})}
\]
where $\omega(\t)$ denotes the number of connected components in the graph $\t$.
In fact, the probability of a spin configuration $x\in\X_V$ is
proportional to the probability that a $\t\sim\xi(p)$ satisfies $B(\t,x)=1$, which
is proportional to $e^{-H(x)}$. Moreover, the distribution of $\t$ is given by
\[
\xi'( \t ) = \xi(\t) \frac{2^{\omega(\t)}}{\xi(2^{\omega(\t)})},
\]
where $\omega(\t)$ denotes the number of components (a.k.a.~``clusters'') in $\t$.
\def\cy#1{[x]_{#1}}
For a subset $S\subset V$ of vertices, consider the spin cylinder $\cy S$.
The conditional distribution of $\cy S$, given the graph $\t$, is then clearly
\[ \mu(x_S|\t) = 2^{-\tl\omega_S(\t)} \cdot b(\t, \cy S)\]
where $\tl\omega_S(\t)$ denote the number of clusters in $\t$ that intersects $S$.
Thus
\(\omega(\t)=\ol\omega_S(\t)+\tl\omega_S(\t)\) where $\ol\omega_S(\t)$ gives the
number of clusters in $\t$ that are disjoint with $S$. We obtain that the
marginal distribution of the cylinder $\cy S$ is
\[\mu(\cy S) = \frac{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_S(\t)} b(\t,\cy S)}}{\XI{2^{\omega(\t)}}}. \]
If $R\subset S$ then we have
\[\mu(\cy S\mid \cy R) =
\frac{\XI{2^{\ol\omega_S(\t)} \cdot b(\t,\cy S)}}
{\XI{2^{\ol\omega_R(\t)} \cdot b(\t,\cy R)}}. \]
\subsection{The one-dimensional Ising-Dyson model}
In the one-dimensional Ising-Dyson model let $V=[-L,L]\subset \ZZ$ and
\[ J_{ij} = \frac \beta{|i-j|^\alpha}.\] We can partition $V$ as $V_- \cup V_+$,
where $V_+=[0,L]$ and $V_-=[-L,-1]$. The random graph $\t^\pm$ is the graph $\t$
induced on $V_\pm$, i.e. $\t_{ij}=1$ only if both ends, $i$ and $j$, are in the
integer interval $V_\pm$. Note that the graphs $\t^+$ and $\t^-$ are independent
under $\xi$. In fact, under the Bernoulli graph model, the graph $\t^+$ is
independent of the graph $\t'=\t\setminus\t^+$.
For $N\ge 0$, let $N$ denote the integer interval $[0,N)$ so that $\cy M = \cy
{[0,M)}$, and $\ol\omega_N = \ol\omega_{[0,N)}$, etc. We also use $\ol N$ to
denote the interval $[N,\infty)$
Let $\mscr L^\pm = \{ C^\pm_1,C^\pm_2, \dots \}$ denote the set of clusters of
the graphs $\t^\pm$ induced on the positive (negative) axis, i.e. the components in the
graphs $\t^\pm$ induced by $\t$ on $V_+$ and $V_-$, respectively. Let $\mscr
R^\pm_N$ be those clusters in $\mscr L^\pm$, respectively, that do not send any
edges to the interval $N=[0,N)$. Thus $\ol\omega_N(\t^\pm)=|\mscr R^\pm_N|$. Let
also $\mscr R''_N$ be the clusters in the graph $\t'=\t\setminus \t^+$ that do
not contain any vertex from $[0,N)$.
\[\includegraphics[page=1,width=0.9\textwidth]{fig.pdf}\]
The one-sided Ising model $\nu(x)$ is obtained from the random cluster model with respect
to spins in $V_+$ and the Bernoulli graph model of $\t^+$.
We may write the marginal of the cylinder $\cy N$ for the \emph{one-sided Ising model} as
\[
\nu(\cy N) =
\frac{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_S(\t^+)} \cdot b(\t^+,\cy N)}}{\XI{2^{\omega(\t^+)}}}
= \frac{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_S(\t^+) + f(\t')} \cdot b(\t^+,\cy N)}}{\XI{2^{\omega(\t^+)+f(\t')}}}.
\]
where $f(\t')$ denotes an arbitrary function of the graph $\t'$.
\def\M{{M}}
\def\N{{N}}
Our aim is to show that for all $x\in\SI^{[0,\infty)}$
\[
\lim_{M,L\to\infty} \frac{\mu(\cy \M \mid \cy \N)}{\nu(\cy\M \mid \cy\N)} = 1+\ordo N \quad\text{as $N\to\infty$.}
\]
We have
\[
\mu([x]_M|[x]_N)\propto \frac{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_M(\t)} \cdot b(\cy M,\t)}}{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_N(\t)} \cdot b(\cy N,\t)}},
\]
where we have $\ol\omega_M(\t)=\ol\omega_N(\t)-K_{M,N}(\t)$ and
$b(\cy M),\t)=b(\cy N,\t)\cdot \tilde b_{M,N}(\t)$. Similarly, we have
\[
\nu([x]_M|[x]_N)\propto \frac{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_M(\t^+)} \cdot b(\cy M,\t^+)}}{\XI{ 2^{\ol\omega_N(\t^+)} \cdot b(\cy N,\t^+)}},
\]
where $\ol\omega_M(\t^+)=\ol\omega_N(\t^+)-K_{M,N}(\t^+)$ and
$b(\cy M,\t^+)=b(\cy N,\t^+)\cdot \tilde b_{M,N}(x,\t^+)=\tilde b_{M,N}(x,\t)$.
We now prove that $\XI{T<N}=1-o(1)$, as $N\to \infty$.
We define a correction term $C_N(\t',\t^+)$ by the identity $$\ol\omega_N(\t)-\ol\omega_N(\t^+)=f(\t')+C_N(\t',\t^+).$$
We can prove that this correction term is bounded, which follows from the inequality
$$
C_N(\t',\t^+)\leq
E(C_k^2) \cdot \sum _{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(N+k)k}<\infty,
$$
where $C_k$ are clusters in $\t[(-\infty, 0])$ ordered after $M(C_k)$,
$M(C_k)\geq k$, and $M(C)=\min \{-i : i\in C \}$.
Conditioned on the event $N>T$, we have that $K_{M,N}(\t^+)=K_{M,N}(\t)$ and that $\tilde b_{M,N}(\t^+)=\tilde b_{M,N}(\t)$.
From the computations above we deduce that
\[
\frac{\mu(\cy\N)}{\nu(\cy\N)} = \text{const.} \times
\frac{\XI{2^{\ol\omega_\N(\t)} \cdot b(\t,\cy\N)}}
{\XI{2^{\ol\omega_\N(\t^+) + f(\t')} \cdot b(\t^+,\cy\N)}}
\]
where the constant is \({\XI{2^{\omega(\t^+)}}}/{\XI{2^{\omega(\t)}}}\).
Then
\begin{equation}
\ol\omega_N(\t) = \ol\omega_N(\t^+) + \ol\omega_N(\t^-) - X_N(\t') + Z_N(\t)
\end{equation}
where $X_N(\t')$ are the number of edges between clusters in $\mscr R^-_N$ and
$\ol N$. The term $Z_N(\t)$ is a correction term which is not independent of $\t^+$.
However, we have
\[ Z_N(\t) \le Y_N(\t')\]
where $Y_N(\t)$ is the number
\[
Y_N(\t') = \sum_{C\in\mscr R^-_N} \max\{|E(C,\ol N)|-1,0\}
\]
We claim that $Y_N(\t')$ has distribution bounded by a Poisson variable
$\opn{Po}(\lambda_N)$ where $\lambda_N\to 0$ as $N\to\infty$.
We let
$$A_N^{(m)}= \int 2^{\overline{\omega}([0,N), G^{(m)}}\cdot B([x]_N,G^{(m)}) \; d\xi (G),$$
$$E=\{(i,j): i<0 \wedge j\geq 0\},$$
$$G^{(m)}=G^+ \cup G^- \cup \{(i,j)\in E: |i|+|j|\leq m\},$$
and
$$r^{(m)}=|G^{(m)}\cap E|.$$
We claim that there exist uniform constants $c_1$ and $c_2$ such that
$$0<c_1\frac{A_N^{(m)}}{A_N^{(0)}}<c_2<\infty,$$
where we study $A_N^{(m)}$ such that we have in the extremes
$$A_N^{(0)}=\nu([x]_N)$$
and
$$A_N^{(\infty)}=K\cdot \mu([x]_N).$$
We have
$$X^{(m)}=K\cdot \int 2^{\overline{\omega}_n(G^{(m)})-r^{(m)}(G)}\cdot B([x]_m, G^{(m)})\; d\xi(G),$$
so that
$$X^{(0)}=\nu([x]_n)$$
and
$$\lim_{m \to \infty} X^{(m)}=C\cdot \mu([x]_n).$$
We have furthermore
$$X^{(0)}\geq X^{(1)}\geq \ldots,$$
but we need to prove that the monotone sequence is bounded away from zero.
We have
$$\nu([x]_n)=\frac{ \int 2^{\omega_n(G^+)}\cdot 2^{-\omega_n(G^+)}\cdot B([x]_n, G^+)\; d\xi(G)}{\int 2^{\omega_n(G)} \; d\xi(G) },$$
where $G^+=G^{(0)}$, and
$$\mu([x]_n)=\frac{ \int 2^{\omega_n(G)}\cdot 2^{-\omega_n(G^)}\cdot B([x]_n, G)\; d\xi(G)}{\int 2^{\omega_n(G)} \; d\xi(G) }.$$
Let
$$K_m=\min \{|i|: i\in C_m\},$$
where $C_m$ is the $m$th cluster. Note that $K_m\geq m$.
We will prove that if $A_n$ is the event that we send one edge from the negative to the positive side (beyond 0), as well as one edge from the negative side beyond $n$, then $P(A_n)\to 0$.
The probability of an edge from cluster $C_i$ (e.g.\ on the negative side) to cluster $C_j$ (e.g.\ on the positive side) is
$$1-e^{-\sum_{C_i} \frac{\beta}{|i-j|^{\alpha}}}.$$
We have
$$\sum_{-k\in C}\frac{\beta}{n+k}\leq |C|\cdot \frac{1}{K_C}\cdot \beta.$$
Hence the probability of valence $\geq 2$ is
$$\leq |C|^2\cdot \frac{1}{K_C^2}\cdot \beta^2.$$
Since then
$$\sum \frac{C_m^2}{K_m^2}<\infty,$$
we have by the Borel--Cantelli lemma only finitely many clusters with valence
$\geq 2$.
\section{Proof of the main results}\noindent
\begin{lem}
There exists a continuous eigenfunction $h$ of ${\mathcal L}$, if
$$\frac{\mu[x_0,\ldots x_N, \ldots, x_n]}{\nu[x_0,\ldots, x_N, \ldots, x_n]}=(1+o(1)) \frac{\mu[x_0,\ldots, x_N]}{\nu[x_0, \ldots, x_N]},$$
as $N\to \infty$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Let $\lambda=1$. By the assumption, the measure $\mu= \h \nu$ is translation
invariant, i.e., $\mu\circ T^{-1}=\mu$. Hence we have $(h\nu)\circ
T^{-1}=h\nu$ and it suffices to show that $(h\nu)\circ T^{-1}=({\mathcal
L}h)\nu$.
Let $A$ be any Borel subset of $X_+$. Then
$$(h\nu)\circ T^{-1} (A)=\int_A \sum_{y: Ty=x} h(y)e^{\phi(y)}\; d\nu(x)=\int_A h(x)\; d\nu(x).$$
\end{proof}
\begin{lem}
If $$\frac{\mu[x_0,\ldots x_N, \ldots, x_n]}{\nu[x_0,\ldots, x_N, \ldots, x_n]}=e^{\xi}\; \; \frac{\mu[x_0,\ldots, x_N]}{\nu[x_0, \ldots, x_N]},$$
then $|\xi|=O(P(A_N))$, where $A_N$ is the event that there exists a cluster
$C\subset [(-\infty, 0]$ with two edges that goes from $C$ into $[N,\infty)$.
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
For the random cluster model, we have that
\[
\mu[x_0,\ldots, x_N]\propto P((t_{ij} \sim [x_0, \ldots, x_N]),
\]
where $\sim$ means that the graph $t_{ij}$ is compatible with the cylinder
$[x_0,\ldots, x_N]$.
We will study conditional probabilities $P(B_M|B_N)$, where $B_M$ means
$t_{ij}\sim [x_0,\ldots, x_M]$.
We have
\[
e^{\xi}=
\frac{K(x_0,\ldots, x_N)P(B_M|B_N)}{\tl K(x_0,\ldots, x_N)P(\tilde B_M|\tilde B_N)}.
\]
We make a coupling with the one-sided system $\tilde t=t[0,\infty)$ and use
the corresponding events $\tilde B_M: \tilde t \sim [x_0,\ldots, x_M]$. Notice
that $B_M\subset \tilde B_M$.
We have
\[
\frac{P(B_M|B_N)}{P(\tilde B_M| \tilde B_N)} = \frac{P(B_M|\tilde B_M, B_N) \P(\tilde B_M|B_N)} {P(\tilde B_M|\tilde B_N)} = \P(B_M|\tilde B_M, B_N)=e^{o(1)},
\]
as $N\to \infty$, independently of $M$.
\end{proof}
\begin{lem}
$$\lim_{N\to \infty} P(A_N)=0.$$
\end{lem}
\begin{proof}
Let $M(C)=\inf \{i\in C \}$ and let $S=P(A_N |t[(-\infty, 0]])$.
We have
$$P(A_N|t[(-\infty, 0]])\leq K \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{C_k}{N+M(C_k)}.$$
The conclusion follows from $E(S)<\infty$.
Let $X(C)$ be the number of clusters $C$ that have edges between $C$ and
$[N,\infty)$. By assuming that $X(C)\sim P_0(\lambda)$, we can make the estimate
$$P(X(C)\geq 2)\leq c\cdot \lambda^2 \leq c\cdot \frac{|C|^2}{(N+M)^2}\cdot \beta^2,$$
where $c=\sum_{k=2}^\infty e^{-\lambda} \frac{\lambda^k}{k!}$.
We have
$$E(S) \leq K \sum_{k=1}^\infty \frac{E(C_k^2)}{(N+k E(C_k))^2},$$
where $C_k$ are clusters in $t[(-\infty, 0])$ ordered after $M(C_k)$,
$M(C_k)\geq k$. We can make an estimate
$$E(S)\leq E(C_k^2)\sum _{k=1}^\infty \frac{1}{(N+k)^2},$$
which proves the lemma, since $E(C_k^2)<\infty$ by
\cite{aizenmanUniquenessInfiniteCluster1987}.
\end{proof}
\section{Nytt}
\hrule
Let $G=(G^+, G^- , E)$, $\gamma=(G^+,G^-)$.
We have
$$d\tl\nu(G)=2^{\omega(G^+)+\omega(G^-)-|E|-\rho_{|E|}}\; d\xi(G),$$
where $\xi$ is the Bernoulli measure, and $E$ is the set of edges from the minus side to the plus side. The term $\rho_{|E|}$ normalises, i.e.\
\[
\rho_{|E|} =
\log \int 2^{\omega(G^+)+\omega(G^-)-|E|}\; d\xi(G).
\]
Notice that
$\omega(G^-)-|E|$ is independent of $G^+$, and so we have $\nu\circ (G^+)^{-1}=\nu(G^+)$.
We have
$$d\mu(G)=2^{q(G)-\rho_q}\; d\nu(G),$$
where $\rho_q$ just normalises $\mu$ and where $q(G)$ is the co-rank in the set $E$, i.e.,
$$
q(G)=\max \{|E|-|T\cap E|\mid \text{$T$ spanning tree of $G$} \}.
$$
Consider the graph $G_{ij}\subset E$ where for $i,j>0$
$$ G_{ij} = \gamma \cup
\{ kl\in E \mid k < i \text{ or } k=i \text{ and } 0>l>-j \}.
$$
We also denote $G_m = \lim_{j\to-\infty} G_{mj}$.
We can define $q(G)$ as the number of edges between $i$ and $-j<0$ that connects vertices ``already'' connected in $G_{ij}$.
It is also clear that $q$ is less than or equal to the number of
cluster in $G^-$ incident with more than one edge of $E$.
We claim that,
$$
P(q|\gamma)\approx \operatorname{Po}(\lambda(\gamma))
$$
where $\lambda(\gamma) = \mathsf E(q|\gamma)$. We have
\[
\lambda(\gamma) = \sum_{i=0}^{\infty} \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} (1-e^{-\frac{\beta}{(i+j)^2}})
\mathsf P(i\sim_{G_{ij}} -j\mid \gamma).
\]
where $a\sim_H b$ states that there is a path between $a$ and $b$ in the graph $H$.
Since $G_{ij}$ is stochastically dominated by $G$ we obtain that
\[
\P(i \sim_{G_{ij}} -j) \le \P(i \sim_G j) = \tau(i+j),
\]
where $\tau(n)$ is the usual two-point correlation function
\[
\tau(n) = \mathsf P(0\sim_G n).
\]
Hence,
\[
\mathsf E(\lambda(\gamma)) \le
\sum_{i=0}^\infty
\sum_{j=1}^\infty \frac\beta{(i+j)^2} \tau(i+j) =
\beta \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac {\tau(n)}n
\]
We need to show that $\E(e^{\lambda(\gamma)})<\infty$, since, from
the Poisson approximation it follows that
$$
g(\gamma)=E(2^{q(G)}|\gamma) \approx e^{\lambda(\gamma)}.
$$
Then we have
$$\frac{d\mu(\gamma)}{d\nu(\gamma)}=g(\gamma) < \infty. $$
For a fixed sequence $x\in\{-1,+1\}^{\ZZ_+}$,
let the measure $\nu(\cdot;[x]_n)$ be defined by
\[
\d\nu\ii n(\gamma) =
\d\nu(\gamma; [x]_n) =
B(\gamma,[x]_n) 2^{\ol\w_n(\gamma)} \d\eta(\gamma).
\]
That is, $\nu(\gamma; [x]_n)$ is $\nu(\gamma)$ conditioned on $\gamma$ and
$[x]_n$ being compatible. Note that $\nu\ii n \prec \nu\ii {n-1}$ in the
stochastic dominance order since $B(\gamma; [x]_n)$ is a decreasing event. Thus
$\tau\ii {n+1} (k) \le \tau\ii n (k) \le \tau(n)$. We have
\[
\nu([x]_n) = \int \d\nu\ii n(\gamma)
\]
Let $b_n(G)=\frac{B(G,[x]_n)}{B(\gamma,[x]_n)}$.
We consider
\begin{gather*}
\log \frac{d\mu([x]_n)}{d\nu([x]_n)}
=
\log {\int \int b_n(\gamma,E)\, 2^{q(\gamma,E)} \, 2^{|E|}\, \d\eta(E)\, d\nu\ii n (\gamma; [x]_n)} \\
- \log {\int \int 2^{|E|} \d\eta(E)\, d\nu\ii n(\gamma; [x]_n) } + \text{constant}
\end{gather*}
We aim to show that, for all $n$,
\begin{equation}
|\log \frac{d\mu([x]_n)}{d\nu([x]_n)}| \le K
\end{equation}
We claim that this holds with $K$ of the order
\[
K(\beta) = \beta \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\tau(n)}{n}.
\]
\[
=\frac{\int2^q 2^{-\omega_n} B\; d\nu}{\int 2^{-\omega_n^+} B^+\; d\nu }
=\frac{\int b_n \cdot 2^{q-r_n}\cdot 2^{-\omega_n^+}\cdot B^+\; d\nu}{\int 2^{-\omega_n^+} B^+\; d\nu},
\]
Hence by defining
$$h_n(\gamma)=\int b_n \cdot 2^{q-r_n}\; d\xi(G),$$
we have
$$f_n=\frac{\int h_n(\gamma)2^{\omega_n^+}\cdot B^+\; d\nu}{\int 2^{\omega_n^+} B^+\; d\nu},$$
and we can obtain an upper bound of $f_n$ by bounding $g(\gamma)$.
\section{New october 2021}
Let
$$
\tilde \eta(\epsilon)= 2^{-|\epsilon|} \ltimes \eta (\epsilon).
$$
Note that both $\eta(\cdot)$ and $\tilde\eta (\cdot)$ are Bernoulli measures.
Let also
$$
d\tilde \nu_n(\gamma) =
\frac{d\nu(\gamma_-)\otimes \tilde \eta(\epsilon)\otimes \nu(\gamma_+)}{\nu(B([x]_n,\gamma_+))}
$$
Let $R_n$ be the number of correcting edges, i.e.,
$$
R_n=\# \{ij\in \epsilon: \omega (G_{< ij}+ij)=\omega (G_{ij}\},\quad j>n.
$$
Let $B_n(\g)=C([x]_n,\gamma)$ be the indicator of the event that cylinder $[x]_n$ is compatible with graph $\g=(\g_-,\e,\g_+)$.
Let also $B'_n(\g) = B_n(\g) + (1-B_n(\g_+))$ indicate compatibility of $[x]_n$ with $\g$ or not compatible with $\g_+$.
We then have
\[
h_n(x) = \frac{\mu [x]_n}{\nu [x]_n}=\int B_n(\g) \cdot 2^{R_n(\g)} \cdot 2^{-r_n}\; d\tilde \nu_n (\gamma)
\]
Note that
$$ R_n(\g) \le Q_n(\g_-,\e) $$
where $Q_n$ denotes the number of edges in $\e$ that connects a vertex $j\ge n$ to a
cluster in $\g_-$ with at least one more edge from the cluster to $[0,n-1]$. That is,
$$ Q_n=\# \{ij \in \epsilon \mid \exists k\, \exists l\, kl\in\e, i \sim_{\gamma-} k, k>i, j > n\}.$$
Notice that $Q_n$ only depends on $(\gamma_-,\epsilon)$.
For $0\leq m\leq n$, let
$$B_n(x,\gamma)=B([x]_m,\gamma)\frac{B([x]_n,\gamma)}{B([x]_m, \gamma)},$$
and define
$$D_{[m,n]}(x,\gamma)=\frac{B([x]_n,\gamma)}{B([x]_m, \gamma)}.$$ We have
$$1\geq D_{[m,n]}(x,\gamma)\geq 1_{\{Q_m>0\}}=D'_m(x,\gamma).$$
We now have
$$ \int B_m D'_m \; d\tilde \nu \leq f_n(x)\leq \int B_m \cdot 1 \cdot 2^{Q_n} \; d\tilde \nu \leq (1+\ordo{1})\int B_m \; d\tilde \nu .$$
We also have
$$B_m\geq \tilde B_m \cdot D'_m,$$
where $\tilde B_m$ is 1 minus the indicator for the event that
Notice that $\tilde B_m$ is independent of $\gamma_+$.
We will now show the continuity of the eigenfunction by proving that
$$f_n(x)=(1+\ordo{1})f_m(x),$$
as $m,n \to \infty$.
We have
$$f_n=\int B_n \cdot 2^{R_n} \; d\tilde \nu_m=(1+\ordo{1})\int B_m \cdot 2^{Q_m} \; d\tilde \nu_m.$$
We can write
$$f_n=\int \hat B_m \cdot X_{m,n} \cdot 2^{Z_{m,n}}\cdot 2^{R_m}\; d\tilde \nu_n=(1+\ordo{1})\int B_m \cdot 2^{R_m}\; d\tilde \nu_m=f_m(1+\ordo{1}).$$
We get
$$\int \hat B_m \cdot X_{m,n} \cdot 2^{Z_{m,n}} \; d\tilde \nu_n \leq f_n\leq \int \hat B_m \cdot 2^{Q_m} \; d\tilde \nu_n,$$
and hence
$$\int B_m \; d\tilde \mu_m \leq f_n \leq \int B_m \cdot 2^{Q_m} \; d\tilde \mu_m,$$
and where both the leftmost and rightmost expressions are $(1+\ordo{1})f_m$, as $m\to \infty$.
The conclusion that $$f_n(x)=(1+\ordo{1})f_m(x),$$
as $m,n \to \infty$, follows from the observations that ($0\leq R_m \leq Q_m$)
$$1-D'_m\leq X\leq 1$$
and
$$\int B_m \cdot 2^{R_m} \; d\tilde \nu_m =(1+\ordo{1})\int \hat B_m \; d\tilde \nu_m,$$
hence
$$\int B_m \cdot 2^{R_m} \; d\tilde \nu_m =(1+\ordo{1})\int \hat B_m \cdot 2^{Q_m} \; d\tilde \nu_m.$$
\section{Continuity}
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{rp{0.8\textwidth}}
$d\tilde\eta(\e)$ & The bernouilli measure $2^{-|\e|}\ltimes d\eta(\e)$ \\
$B_n$ & The indicator of the event $[x]_n$ compatible with $\g$. \\
$B_n^+$ & The indicator of the event $[x]_n$ compatible with $\g_+$. \\
$B'_n(\g)$ & The indicator of the event $[x]_n$ is
compatible with $\g$ or not compatible with $\g_+$. \\
$\hat B_n(\g_-,\e)$ & The indicator of the event that there are
no two edges from some cluster $C$ in $\g_-$
to a pair $i,j\in[0,n)$ having opposite spins,
i.e. such that $x_i x_j = -1$. \\
$\hat X_n(\g_-,\e)$ & The indicator of the event that $Q_n=0$. \\
$R_n(\g)$ & Correction term so that
$$ d\mu(\g|B^+_n) = B'_n \cdot 2^{R_n(\g)} \ltimes d\nu(\g_-) \d\tilde\eta(\e) \d\nu(\g_+|B_n) $$ \\
$Q_{>n}(\g_-,\e)$ & Number of edges in $\e$ from clusters of $\g_-$ to vertices in $(n,\infty)$
such that there is at least one more edge in $\e$ from the same cluster to $[0,\infty)$
preceding it in some order\\
$Q(\g_-,\e)$ & Number of edges in $\e$ from clusters of $\g_-$ to vertices in $[0,\infty)$
such that there is at least one more edge in $\e$ from the same cluster to $[0,\infty)$
preceding it in some order\\
$X(C)$ & For a cluster $C\subset \g_{-}$ it is the number of edges in $\e$ to $[0,\infty]$. \\
$i(C)$ & For a cluster $C\subset \g_{-}$ it is the rightmost vertex, i.e.\ $i(C)=\max \{j\in C\}$. \\
$\lambda(C)$ & The sum $\lambda(C) = \frac{\beta}{2} \sum_{j\in C} \frac 1j$. \\
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
Our aim is to show that the limit $h(x)=\lim_{n\to\infty} h_n(x)$ is continuous where, form $m\ge1$
\(h_m(x) = \dfrac{\mu([x]_m)}{\nu([x]_m)}\).
Recall that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:3}
h_m(x) = \int B'_m 2^{R_m} \d \nu(\g_-)\d\tl\eta(\e) \d \nu(\g_+|B_m^+).
\end{equation}
Since $R_m$ is the number of edges in $\e$ that do not reduce (with respect to
some order) the number of components in $\g\triangleright [0,n]$, it is clear
that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:RleQ}
R_m \le Q_{>m}
\end{equation}
where \(Q_{>m}\) is the number of edges $ij\in\e$ where $i>n$ and $-j$ belongs
to a cluster $C$ in $\g_-$ that sends at least one more edge to $[0,\infty)$.
For $n\le m$, we have
$$ \hat B_n \hat X_n \le B'_m \le \hat B_n $$
and, on account of \eqref{eq:RleQ}, it follows that
\begin{equation}\label{eq:4}
\int \hat B_n \hat X_n \d \nu(\g_-) \d\tl\eta(\e)
\le h_m(x) \le \int \hat B_n 2^{Q_{>n}} \d\nu(\g_-) \d\tl\eta(\e).
\end{equation}
We have used that $\hat B_n$, $\hat X_n$ and $Q_{>m}$ are independent of $\g_+$ and that
$$\int\d\nu(\g_+|B_m^+)=1. $$
Since both $\hat B_n$ and $\hat X_n$ are decreasing in $(\g_-,\e)$ it follows
from the FKG inequality that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:5}
I_n \cdot \int \hat X_n \d\nu(\g_-) \d\tl\eta(\e)
\le h_m(x)
\le I_n \cdot \int 2^{Q_{>n}} \d\nu(\g_-) \d\tl\eta(\e).
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:6}
I_n = \int \hat B_n \d\nu(\g_-) \d\tl\eta(\e).
\end{equation}
We prove the following lemma.
\begin{lemma}\label{lem:qn}
The integral
\[
\int 2^{Q_{>n}} \d\nu(\g_-)\, \d\tilde\eta(\e) = 1+\ordo{1}.
\]
as $n\to\infty$.
\end{lemma}
From \eqref{eq:5} and this lemma we deduce that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:2}
h_m(x) = (1+\ordo1) I_n = h_n(x) \cdot (1+\ordo1)
\end{equation}
if $m\ge n$ as $n\to\infty$. It follows that $\log h_n(x)$ is a Cauchy sequence
and hence that the limit $h(x)$ is continuous.
\subsubsection*{Proof of Lemma~\ref{lem:qn}}
We condition on a fixed graph $\g_-$ with distribution $\nu_-$. Let $C$ be a cluster of $\g_-$.
Note that
$$
Q=(X(C_1) -1)_{+} +(X(C_2)-1)_{+} + \ldots
$$
where $X(C_i)$, is a sum of independent Bernoulli variables
$$
X(C) = \sum_{-j\in C} \sum_{i=0}^\infty \e_{ji}
$$
where
$$
\P(\e_{ij}=1) = \frac{1- \exp\{-\frac \beta{(i+j)^2}\}}{2}
$$
It follows that we can approximate $X(C)$ with a Poisson variable
$\tl X(C) \sim \opn{Po}(\lambda(C))$ with
$$
\lambda(C) = \frac{\beta}{2} \sum_{j\in C} \frac 1j
\approx \frac{\beta}{2} \sum_{j\in C} \sum_{i=0}^\infty \P(\e_{ij}=1).
$$
Note that
\begin{equation}
\label{eq:lambdabound}
\lambda(C) \leq \log \left(1+\frac{|C|}{i(C)}\right)
\end{equation}
where $-i(C)=\max C$.
Order the clusters of $\g_-$ as $C_1,C_2,\dots$ etc. so that
$1=i(C_1)<i(C_2)<\dots$. For each cluster $C_i$ we can from stochastic dominance
construct a random cluster $\tl C_i$ such that (i) $C_i\subset \tl C_i$ and (ii)
$i(\tl C_i)=i(C_i)$. We can further assume that the $\tl C_i$s are \emph{independent}.
Let now
\[
\tl Q = \sum_{C_i} (\tl X(\tl C_i) - 1)_+.
\]
where $\P(\tl X(\tl C)| \tl C) = \opn{Po}(\lambda(\tl C))$ which stochastically
dominates $X(C)$. Note that for a poissonvariable $X\sim\opn{Po}(\lambda)$ we have
\[
\E(2^{(X-1)_+}) = \frac{\exp(\lambda(e^{\ln 2}-1)) + \exp(-\lambda) }{2} = \cosh(\lambda)
\]
We then have
\[
\E(2^Q | \gamma_- )\leq \prod \cosh (\lambda(C_i))\leq \prod \cosh (\lambda (\tilde C_i)).
\]
Since clearly $i(C_k)\leq k$ the bound \eqref{eq:lambdabound} gives that
\[
\E(2^Q)\le\prod_k \E\left(\cosh\left( \log\left(1+\frac{|\tilde C_k|}{k}\right)\right)\right)
\]
If $|C_k|\leq 0.1 k$, then
$$\cosh (\lambda (\tilde C_k))\leq 1+\left( \frac{|\tilde C_k|}{i(\tilde C_k)}\right)^2,$$
so
$$E[2^Q]\leq \prod_{k=1}^\infty E \left(\cosh \left(\log \left(1+\frac{|\tilde C_k |}{k} \right) \right) \right).$$
We have (with $\tilde C_k$ independent)
$$E\left(\frac{1}{2}(1+\frac{|\tilde C_k|}{k}+\frac{1}{1+\frac{|\tilde C_k|}{k}}) \right)$$
$$=E\left(\frac{1}{2}(1+\frac{|\tilde C_k|^2}{k^2}-\frac{|\tilde C_k|^3}{k^3}+\cdots )\right).$$
\printbibliography
\noindent
Anders Johansson, Department of Mathematics, University of G\"avle,
801 76 G\"avle, Sweden. Email-address: ajj@hig.se\newline
\noindent
Anders \"Oberg, Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, P.O.\
Box 480, 751 06 Uppsala, Sweden. E-mail-address:
anders@math.uu.se\newline
\noindent
Mark Pollicott, Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick,
Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. Email-address: mpollic@maths.warwick.ac.uk\newline
\noindent
Evgeny Verbitskiy, Mathematical Institute, Leiden University,
Niels Bohrweg 1, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail address: evgeny@math.leidenuniv.nl
\end{document}
% Local Variables:
% ispell-local-dictionary'': "british"
% End: