Firebase InAppMessaging resource bundle generation

[Bogdan-Belogurov]

Hello, I am trying to cache FirebaseInAppMessagingSwift-Beta target form firebase-ios-sdk. And tuist generates a resource bundle with FirebaseInAppMessaging_iOSResources name. This leads to an Resource bundle is missing error when I try to tests InAppMessaging via the Firebase website. After some investigation, I found out that FirebaseInAppMessagingSwift-Beta target uses Firebase_FirebaseInAppMessaging_iOS name for bundle resources. When I rename the bundle manually, everything works fine.
As work around I can use script to rename bundle after tuist cache warm -x.
Can you help me understand which side is the problem?

[fortmarek]

Hey @Bogdan-Belogurov 👋

So, everything works correctly locally?

What do you mean by This leads to an Resource bundle is missing error when I try to tests InAppMessaging via the Firebase website?

[Bogdan-Belogurov]

Hi, @fortmarek.
InAppMessaging allows you to create campaigns and test them on your devise. When I was working with SPM, everything worked fine. After switching to tuist during testing campaigns, I get Resource bundle is missing error. As I understand it, this is due to a strange bundle name during the tuist caching process.

So, everything works correctly locally?

Yes, but I think it's not a good practice to rename bundles using an additional bash script.

[fortmarek]

As I understand it, this is due to a strange bundle name during the tuist caching process.

Could you create an issue with a reproducible sample? I think we'll need to adhere to the SPM convention, so this works properly.

[danieleformichelli]

I think SPM just uses a dynamic package in this case? I don't think there is another way to keep the same name of the main bundle.
If you want to try, you can specify to use framework instead of staticFramework for that target in Dependencies.swift

[Bogdan-Belogurov]

@danyf90 As I can see, tuist almost correctly decodes the bundle name. After tuist we got FirebaseInAppMessaging_iOSResources.
Here we have two differences Firebase_InAppMessaging_iOSResources. Missed first underscore and redundunt Resources postfix. For me it looks like Tuist should update parse method. What do you think?

[Bogdan-Belogurov]

Thanks 🙏🏻
Fixed in #4542