Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[suggestion] is it possible to add feature of provider api #94

Open
warjiang opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[suggestion] is it possible to add feature of provider api #94

warjiang opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@warjiang
Copy link
Contributor

provider api means that not only we can get host from location ssh config file, but also from a rest api, the rest api should have some restriction, like data restriction.

@lonnywong
Copy link
Member

It is technically possible, but there may be some security risks.
It will be more complicated, and the requirements for users will be very high.

@warjiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

warjiang commented Mar 11, 2024

or may a plugin of trzsa-ssh.

It is technically possible, but there may be some security risks. It will be more complicated, and the requirements for users will be very high.

indeed. tssh provide a open-box options for most of users. If supported this feature, for advanced user, we can provide spec to let them to implemented, for common user, we can provide a subproject in form of docker to reduce the complexity of provide api.

It is technically possible, but there may be some security risks.

cannot agree with this point any more, so we need to have a full consideration.

@lonnywong
Copy link
Member

Is it possible for users to implement a client themselves, write a custom configuration file after obtaining the informations, and then specify the default configuration file in ~/.tssh.conf?

@warjiang
Copy link
Contributor Author

sounds feasible 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants