Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any QoL changes desired from fastutils itself? #15

Open
techsy730 opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Any QoL changes desired from fastutils itself? #15

techsy730 opened this issue Dec 3, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@techsy730
Copy link

techsy730 commented Dec 3, 2023

Hello, I'm someone who has contributed code to fastutils, and have recently gained some more free time for open source contributions.

I've recently learned of this project, and thank you for stepping up to fill in a sorely missing hole in the fastutils API. 🙂

Do you have any annoying pain points in fastutils that fixing might help? And/or any sorely lacking API we could provide?

For example, would having an Int2IntConcurrentMap (and friends) interface, which basically smushes together ...fastutil.ints.Int2IntMap and java.util.ConcurrentMap (and of course the other combinations) be helpful?

@mchernyakov
Copy link
Contributor

@techsy730 Hi, thanks for offering help.
Initially, the lib was designed for internal purposes, where the map set is not very diverse.
If you see some need to add more maps -- feel free to open a PR, but ping pls @sarveswaran-m @erdoganf @nikdom as I am no longer part of the development team.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants