Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TypeError: RequestInit: duplex option is required when sending a body. #535

Open
ghost opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 14, 2023

BUG

The sidetree.js/package/dashboard is using the typescripts in which "duplex" is missing from RequestInit. This causes"TypeError: RequestInit: duplex option is required when sending a body."when it calls eth_getBlockByNumber of ganache-cli. I tried to fix it by that others had done in node#46221 but I got failed for there is no such a properties named "duplex" in typescript's lib. I want to know how to fix it.

environment

node v20.2.0
npm 9.6.7
WSL Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Ganache CLI v6.12.2 (ganache-core: 2.13.2)

detail

End batch writing. Duration: 11 ms.
Waiting for 1 seconds before writing another batch.
Fetching Sidetree transactions from blockchain service...
Fetched 0 Sidetree transactions from blockchain service in 4 ms.
Successfully kicked off downloading/processing of all new Sidetree transactions.
Processing previously unresolvable transactions if any...
Fetched 0 unresolvable transactions to retry in 1 ms.
Event emitted: sidetree_observer_loop_success
Waiting for 1 seconds before fetching and processing transactions again.
Start operation batch writing...
Unexpected and unhandled error during batch writing, investigate and fix:
TypeError: RequestInit: duplex option is required when sending a body.
    at Object.fetch (node:internal/deps/undici/undici:11522:11)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

0 participants