Skip to content

TopoLVM is quite aggressive at grabbing storage and this should be more explicitly advertised/configurable #707

Answered by toshipp
ElCoyote27 asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @ElCoyote27
I assume you used lvm-operator. If so, could you report this issue to Red Hat?
TopoLVM organization and project are NOT maintained by Red Hat. They developed lvm-operator and added topolvm to their suites solely.

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by daichimukai
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants