Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Routersploit run command error? #760

Open
hecker-code opened this issue Sep 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Routersploit run command error? #760

hecker-code opened this issue Sep 19, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@hecker-code
Copy link

I have this issue o my kali Linux Idk why but whenever I run the command "run" or "exploit" I got this error it was already submitted way back in 2018 but I can't see how to fix the issue.
rsf > use scanners/cameras/camera_scan
rsf (Camera Scanner) > set target 68.142.41.208
[+] target => 68.142.41.208
rsf (Camera Scanner) > run
[*] Running module scanners/cameras/camera_scan...

[*] 68.142.41.208 Starting vulnerability check...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/interpreter.py", line 389, in command_run
self.current_module.run()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/modules/scanners/autopwn.py", line 77, in run
for module in utils.iter_modules(directory):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/core/exploit/utils.py", line 138, in iter_modules
yield import_exploit(path)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/core/exploit/utils.py", line 109, in import_exploit
module = importlib.import_module(path)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/importlib/init.py", line 127, in import_module
return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
File "", line 1030, in _gcd_import
File "", line 1007, in _find_and_load
File "", line 986, in _find_and_load_unlocked
File "", line 680, in _load_unlocked
File "", line 850, in exec_module
File "", line 228, in _call_with_frames_removed
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/modules/exploits/generic/ssh_auth_keys.py", line 4, in
from routersploit.core.ssh.ssh_client import SSHClient
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/core/ssh/ssh_client.py", line 2, in
import paramiko
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/paramiko/init.py", line 30, in
from paramiko.transport import SecurityOptions, Transport
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/paramiko/transport.py", line 65, in
from paramiko.sftp_client import SFTPClient
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/paramiko/sftp_client.py", line 41, in
from paramiko.sftp_file import SFTPFile
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/dist-packages/paramiko/sftp_file.py", line 66
self._close(async=True)
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/routersploit", line 29, in
routersploit(sys.argv)
File "/usr/bin/routersploit", line 25, in routersploit
rsf.start()
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/interpreter.py", line 125, in start
command_handler(args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/core/exploit/utils.py", line 177, in wrapper
return fn(self, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/routersploit/interpreter.py", line 394, in command_run
print_error(traceback.format_exc(sys.exc_info()))
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/traceback.py", line 167, in format_exc
return "".join(format_exception(*sys.exc_info(), limit=limit, chain=chain))
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/traceback.py", line 120, in format_exception
return list(TracebackException(
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/traceback.py", line 517, in init
self.stack = StackSummary.extract(
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/traceback.py", line 340, in extract
if limit >= 0:
TypeError: '>=' not supported between instances of 'tuple' and 'int'

I love this tool but can someone please help me fix this issue?

@Elias-Yona
Copy link

Had the same error and this fix worked #577 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants