New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

check whether it makes sense to replace matrix inversion by scalar inversion #59

Open

davidsebfischer opened this issue Jan 9, 2019 · 0 comments

Assignees

Labels

Contributor

davidsebfischer commented Jan 9, 2019

Ie wrap tf.lstqsq and replace by 1/x. Could be faster for models with 1 parameter.

davidsebfischer self-assigned this

davidsebfischer added the enhancement label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment