Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rework side panel / classic view mode, fix inconsistencies with the Server Browser (sub-tasks) #3203

Open
1 of 7 tasks
Tracked by #3161
Zatline opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 7 tasks
Tracked by #3161

Comments

@Zatline
Copy link
Member

Zatline commented Jun 14, 2023

follow up of task 1 in #3161, sub-tasks:

(...)

improved design mockups:
Srv Browser - Classic View
Srv Browser - Classic View – 1
Srv Browser - Classic View – 2

jtbx added a commit to jtbx-prs/teeworlds that referenced this issue Nov 11, 2023
Based on the problems addressed in teeworlds#3161 and the mockups provided in teeworlds#3203.

Changes:
 - Turn server list header into a non-rounded rectangle and use full
   white transparency when selected
 - Shorten the width of the Ping column
 - Remove difficulty icon from browser entries
 - Add a small margin to gametype icons in browser entries
 - Make the sorted column more opaque so it's easier to see
 - Display the "% loaded" message in the middle of the status rect
 - Alter the colors of friends list entries to make them more vibrant
 - Make friends list entries more opaque (and nicer to look at)
 - Use different style headings for sidebar tabs
 - Add a parameter "Transparent" to DoButton_CheckBox which decides
   whether a check box's background should be transparent. This is
   used in the filter tab to remove the look of the weird corners and
   unfitting opacity on each of the checkboxes.
 - Use more opacity and rounding for the rects in info and filter tabs
 - Align text to the right in the "Server details" rect
 - Remove gametype and difficulty icons in the "Server details" rect
 - Use wideview style entries by default
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant