You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now we don't properly kern the backwards E in \XeTeX, purely just because I needed to customize the macro and didn't take the time to replicate it.
To fix this, we need to make our overridden macro a bit more sophisticated, here:
A macro with proper kerning would need to be wrapped in the \special commands to turn the full expression into a "canvas", as in the version of the \TeX macro redefined in the preamble:
Note that the \XeTeX currently uses the wrapped \TeX expression in its definition. I'm not sure what will happen if we try to nest canvases by keeping things that way!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now we don't properly kern the backwards E in \XeTeX, purely just because I needed to customize the macro and didn't take the time to replicate it.
To fix this, we need to make our overridden macro a bit more sophisticated, here:
https://github.com/tectonic-typesetting/tt-weave/blob/main/template/src/xetex-overrides.tex#L6
A macro with proper kerning would need to be wrapped in the
\special
commands to turn the full expression into a "canvas", as in the version of the\TeX
macro redefined in the preamble:https://github.com/tectonic-typesetting/tt-weave/blob/main/template/src/_preamble.tex#L59-L60
Note that the
\XeTeX
currently uses the wrapped\TeX
expression in its definition. I'm not sure what will happen if we try to nest canvases by keeping things that way!The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: