License under a more permissive license?

[johnpyp]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

For many companies, usage of AGPL software is a non starter, even if there may be ways to technically use/run the software in a compliant way.

Currently, I'm honestly not even sure if I can use the one click hosting offerings in the readme while complying with the AGPL. It could also be completely fine. I have no idea, and because I'm not a lawyer and the AGPL makes this decision way harder than it should be :(

Describe the solution you'd like

Assuming the intent is for teable to be used commercially self-hosted, changing the license to be more permissive (or dual licensing), would help a lot.

Describe alternatives you've considered

N/A

Additional context

N/A

[tea-artist]

Thank you for your suggestion. We will consider the problem carefully