Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugs in noise_source_location? #595

Open
ge98fiy opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Bugs in noise_source_location? #595

ge98fiy opened this issue Jun 7, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@ge98fiy
Copy link

ge98fiy commented Jun 7, 2022

  1. l. 76, 107 & 141: the diameter should be divided by 20 and not 200 acc. to p.73 in SAE ARP876.

diameter

  1. l.94 & 104: The las part of the equation for XJ should read: (Velocity_secondary/Velocity_aircraft) instead of (Velocity_secondary/(Velocity_secondary-Velocity_aircraft)):

X_s

  1. Whereever the parameter B is calculated: I think the brackets are wrong here, because the eqaution reads "XXX/sin(theta) + cot(theta)" instead of "XXX + cot(theta)" [--> cot(theta) = cos(theta) / sin(theta)]. See screenshot from SAE ARP876 below:

B

@planes
Copy link
Member

planes commented Jun 8, 2022

Hi! We appreciate you finding all these issues.

The developer who put all this module together is no longer actively developing SUAVE. So if you're able, we would welcome a pull request with these fixes. Let me know if you have any questions. I'm happy to help.

@ge98fiy
Copy link
Author

ge98fiy commented Jun 9, 2022

Hey Emilio,

Thanks for replying. What a pitty that the developer is no longer working on SUAVE...

Actually, I only took the python code as a baseline to transform it to a Matlab code, so I'm not really working on your code. However, I thought it'd be kind to tell you about the issues/bugs I've found when comparing the code to the original source, so I opened the issues. Most of the things are pretty straight forward to change and don't need to be discussed I think. Nevertheless, I'd welcome your opinion on issues #592 and #589, as I'm unsure about these.

Looking forward to your comments,
Anna

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants