You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In current docs page there are the new roles and sub-protocols introduced by SV2: if the roles can be well understood looking at homepage schemas, maybe the new sub-protocols are not very understandable without any schema.
For this reason I worked on a draft proposal, which restructures the layout of that page, inserting the schema present in the homepage, customized for every role and sub-protocol.
For example, this is the improvement which I thought for the Roles section:
NOTE: copy of Job Negotiators and Template Providers need to be reviewed, since I think that the words I put in red have to be deleted/changed in some way.
This is the improvement for the Sub-protocols section:
NOTE: here I'd like to have opinions about the Job Distribution Protocol, since I don't know if it could be better to not mention it (in a first place) since it's not well described in specs.
Warning For now I just worked on Canva, so I need to think how to implement it yet. Also I think that the schemas which I modified, have to be redesigned in a more accurate way, if they are checked and approved by all of you.
Hope to get as more feedback as possible!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
GitGab19
changed the title
Improvement
Improvements for Documentation page
Mar 10, 2023
In current docs page there are the new roles and sub-protocols introduced by SV2: if the roles can be well understood looking at homepage schemas, maybe the new sub-protocols are not very understandable without any schema.
For this reason I worked on a draft proposal, which restructures the layout of that page, inserting the schema present in the homepage, customized for every role and sub-protocol.
For example, this is the improvement which I thought for the Roles section:
NOTE: copy of Job Negotiators and Template Providers need to be reviewed, since I think that the words I put in red have to be deleted/changed in some way.
This is the improvement for the Sub-protocols section:
NOTE: here I'd like to have opinions about the Job Distribution Protocol, since I don't know if it could be better to not mention it (in a first place) since it's not well described in specs.
Hope to get as more feedback as possible!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: