Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Train_loc, val_loc, and trainval_loc #5

Open
sangrockEG opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Train_loc, val_loc, and trainval_loc #5

sangrockEG opened this issue Mar 23, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@sangrockEG
Copy link

I downloaded xlsa17 proposed split dataset to test CUB.
But att_mat does not contain neither train_loc or val_loc keys. It only includes trainval_loc.
Funny thing is, in standard split, there exists train_loc and val_loc.
Is it intended?

@jwliu-cc
Copy link

I've got the same problem. And I extracted train_loc and val_loc from trainval_loc according to "trainclasses.txt" and "valclasses.txt". But the result is not so good, especially at test_seen.

@sangrockEG
Copy link
Author

I did not test with train/val split of trainval class, so thanks for your comment.
Is your result much worse than the result of paper?
It's really weird.. may only the authors can help us.

@jwliu-cc
Copy link

The 'gzsl unseen' is 34. while it is 39.3 in the paper. And the 'gzsl seen' is only 26. while it is 66.7 in the paper. The classifier is knn so I even try to train knn with trainval_loc and test with test_seen, but it only got 47. I'm very confused...

@lixiaorui4444
Copy link

The dataset CADA-VAE provides works well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants