Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Proposal implementation #1088 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Can you please remind me if there are any legit cases when you'd want to use those APIs over the metadata ones? Only when you don't care about the lossiness of the elements API? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Right, there are a lot of cases where they are safe to use (non-intrinsic types) and completely applicable when reading from Java sources. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I've been thinking about the
TypeMirror->TypeNameAPIs and I think what coroutines did withGlobalScopeis a neat middle ground: annotate them with an experimental annotation like@SensitiveKotlinPoetApi.So if you opt in to using it, you're saying you Know What You're Doing™️. Then we could undeprecate them and leave them for those specific cases.
Thoughts?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions