Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use md2html instead of pandoc2html? #62

Open
mpastell opened this issue Aug 19, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Use md2html instead of pandoc2html? #62

mpastell opened this issue Aug 19, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@mpastell
Copy link

Is there a particular reason to use pandoc2html instead of md2html to render the reports? The advantage for using md2html is that you don't need pandoc, but then again you lose pandoc extensions.

@ccordoba12 ccordoba12 added this to the v0.2 milestone Aug 19, 2017
@ccordoba12
Copy link
Member

@rlaverde, we could look for pandoc first and if we fail to find it we could fallback to md2html.

@rlaverde
Copy link
Member

Is there a particular reason to use pandoc2html instead of md2html to render the reports?

Hmm no, I think that I was looking at 0.2.5 documentation, and didn't know about the existence of md2html

we could look for pandoc first and if we fail to find it we could fallback to md2html.

Yes, and make pandoc an optional dependency, maybe add a comment in the welcome page about installing it if you want pandoc extensions.

@ccordoba12
Copy link
Member

Yes, and make pandoc an optional dependency, maybe add a comment in the welcome page about installing it if you want pandoc extensions.

Agreed.

@rlaverde rlaverde mentioned this issue Aug 31, 2017
1 task
@goanpeca goanpeca added the v0.2 label Feb 19, 2020
@goanpeca goanpeca removed this from the v0.2 milestone Feb 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants