We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I'd like to know why did electrum use two input while the smallest one was large enough.
The transaction paid more than 60$ in fees, not really a good time to consolidate.
There was 5 other input that were large enough for 0.0579265 on their own, Why chose two?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm. Not sure. Normally the coinchooser would not add unnecessary inputs atm.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Afaik was the most regular type of transaction possible.
RBF by default, No coin selection, No pay to many.
Will follow up if something like that happens again.
No branches or pull requests
I'd like to know why did electrum use two input while the smallest one was large enough.
The transaction paid more than 60$ in fees, not really a good time to consolidate.
There was 5 other input that were large enough for 0.0579265 on their own, Why chose two?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: