Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How are (non-network) fees calculated, and how is Realm itself governed?! [Support] [Docs] [Disclosure] #1801

Open
kopeboy opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@kopeboy
Copy link

kopeboy commented Aug 31, 2023

For example I noticed adding a comment on a vote incurs in an additional 0.0007 SOL fee every 100 characters. How is this determined and who's getting the (non-network) fee? For how long I can consider the comments on a proposal stored (by having paid this fee)?

Is Realm itself (its contracts, dev team, UI & off-chain services & infrastructure, etc.) governed by a realm? Shouldn't all of this made clear in the docs? Thank you

@asktree
Copy link
Collaborator

asktree commented Sep 11, 2023

Hi @kopeboy, these are great questions. We track feedback in our discord, I made a feedback thread for you there.

The additional fees you're seeing, such as fees for voting or commenting, are all network fees -- there is a small cost for putting more data on-chain. Comments and proposals are stored forever.

There is a DAO for governance of the Realms program. I think it's this one: https://app.realms.today/dao/RCH

@kopeboy
Copy link
Author

kopeboy commented Nov 27, 2023

Thank you for the answers :)
Sorry but I never use Discord (too much noise, and how to find your thread in the future?) so I didn't follow up there.
I was asking because it seemed that fees had some arbitrary components (not only automatically calculated by the network), so is there a way to check myself in the programs code?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants