New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Accepted] SDL 0226 - Add iOS SDLManager RPC Subscriptions #714
Comments
The only issue I have with this proposal is |
I understand the concern. I originally had it mimicking the Java Suite listener more closely. However, the reason I chose to go in a different direction was: The iOS library currently has a way to subscribe to RPC callbacks through the iOS Alternatively, we could deprecate all of the existing iOS RPC callback strings and re-do it to be closer to the Android API (by passing the RPC name and type). |
The Steering Committee fully agreed to accept this proposal. It was noted that it's important that the implementation of this feature aligns as best as possible with the Java Suite library. |
Issue Entered: smartdevicelink/sdl_ios#1257 |
Hello SDL community,
The review of "SDL 0226 - Add iOS SDLManager RPC Subscriptions" begins now and runs through May 7, 2019. The proposal is available here:
https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/proposals/0226-ios-manager-rpc-subscriptions.md
Reviews are an important part of the SDL evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the associated Github issue at:
#714
What goes into a review?
The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and, eventually, determine the direction of SDL. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
Please state explicitly whether you believe that the proposal should be accepted into SDL.
More information about the SDL evolution process is available at
https://github.com/smartdevicelink/sdl_evolution/blob/master/process.md
Thank you,
Theresa Lech
Program Manager - Livio
theresa@livio.io
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: