Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text-processing for changes #52

Open
nicho90 opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Text-processing for changes #52

nicho90 opened this issue Jun 14, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@nicho90
Copy link
Contributor

nicho90 commented Jun 14, 2018

The ability to see what was changed from the previous to the current revision could increase the efficiency during the review process. For example: After a document was already reviewed and accepted by a member of the Ethics committee, the researcher edited something (maybe just one word or a simple typo), s/he has to submit the document again. Now, the reviewer has to read through the whole document again to see what was changed. A text-processing tool, which highlights the changes (red for deletions/modifications, green for editions) would be very helpful. On GitHub or other collaborations tools, such a function is often called "text differencing" or "diff". I found some possible implementations here:

@nicho90 nicho90 added this to TODO in Version 1.1 Jun 14, 2018
nicho90 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2018
@nicho90 nicho90 self-assigned this Jul 1, 2018
@nicho90 nicho90 moved this from TODO to Done in Version 1.1 Jul 1, 2018
@nicho90
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicho90 commented Jul 1, 2018

@SpeckiJ Mostly done. Please checkout the feature/diff branch.

nicho90 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2018
- Added missing German and Portuguese entries in templates
- Bug-fixes in controllers
- Small design improvements
@nicho90
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicho90 commented Jul 4, 2018

@SpeckiJ Done ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant