Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Emperor Vek'nilash and Emperor Vek'lor #40

Open
Kelzior opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

Emperor Vek'nilash and Emperor Vek'lor #40

Kelzior opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@Kelzior
Copy link

Kelzior commented Mar 23, 2015

http://db.vanillagaming.org/?npc=15276 and http://db.vanillagaming.org/?npc=15275
Attacking Vek'nilash will not pull Vek'lor instantly, as they should.
They will still switch places, but immediately resetting HP afterwards. The teleported Vek'lorwill still aggro and kill you though.

Vek'lor should do magic damage is shoudl be immune to physical
the other one is a warrior and should be immune to magic.

Regards

@cala
Copy link
Contributor

cala commented Mar 23, 2015

The two NPCs may missing their link, this should be DB stuff.

For the second part of the issue you are reporting, I understand that both emperors are currently missing their respective immunities. Am I right?

@Tobschinski
Copy link
Contributor

Last time I pulled them I wasn't able to do so because cmangos' default view distance for dungeons is way too low. Creatures that cannot be seen by any player will not have their movement updated and therefore, immediately reset.

@Schmoozerd
Copy link
Member

Can you debug which settings/ lines are relevant for this.
As this is a huge (and unnecessairy) disappointment, i think a simple override for instances should be fine there (maybe even increase default values a little as well)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 10, 2015

you need use spellhit to work the special ability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants