Is context as an object an outdated format? #3073
Unanswered
spartahawk
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Not quite sure I understand your last question. An example would probably help. But to clarify what "context" is and the shapes it could have, take a look at the JSON-LD spec itself https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#dfn-context |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm trying to make use of json-ld.net expansion and contraction given the json-ld formatting I'm seeing from major retailers. Are you aware of a discrepancy that follows?
In the repo readme, the example for expansion in the installation uses this example for the json-ld to be expanded:
{"@context":{ "test":"http://www.example.org/"},"test:hello":"world"}
However the major retailers I've looked at have it in something like the following format:
{"@context":"https://schema.org/", "@type":"Product", "image":"https://exampleimage.jpeg/",
"name":"fake product name", "sku":"2345624623", ...}
Is there a way to easily convert this latter format to the format where the context is containing individualized urls for each name/value pair?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions