Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Two analyses of the same code yielded different results #13

Open
februaryfang opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Two analyses of the same code yielded different results #13

februaryfang opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@februaryfang
Copy link

februaryfang commented Feb 1, 2023

Hello,

I run the same code by twice. I did not change anything. And I set the same seed number like your examples.
But I got the different result of "true_cell_top_idx" for each cell. Is this a bug? Or is it because of the permutation test method?

Best

@fl-yu
Copy link
Member

fl-yu commented Feb 5, 2023

Hi thank you for using our tool! This is a tricky problem that we are still thinking about how to resolve it properly. We realized that setting a seed is not enough.

Given that network propagation is a stochastic process at each step of the iteration, the probability (information) of each cell can be different even if a stationary state of the entire cell-to-cell network is reached. Although two independent analyses with the same settings result in different true_cell_top_idx, I believe the differences should be very subtle and will not affect the following analysis.
Please let me know if have any other questions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants