New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TLS1.3 performance problem #1751
Comments
Why are you not testing aws-lc-rs support? Are your results in line with https://github.com/aochagavia/rustls-bench-results? |
The test is against rustls 0.21 branch and I will try 0.22 ring & 0.22 aws-lc in the next few days. We did test 0.22 here https://bytedance.larkoffice.com/docx/TSqmdLNIyozJdCx4rzqcjPyonjd, and the difference between 0.21&0.22ring&0.22aws-lc is not too much.
No, I haven't checked that. |
I also add tls1.2 test result here https://bytedance.larkoffice.com/docx/NEqXdDyq8op8mwx0XTWcwgionnf. |
There have been some recent changes on the main branch. Would it be hard to try this with current rustls main? |
The max RPS (ring) is still around 54000. I just bump the version here bytedance/g3@0c2feaf without any API changes. |
Are you building with gcc or clang? |
I didn't set a custom CC, so it should be gcc. |
recent clang should be faster. |
See https://bytedance.larkoffice.com/docx/NEqXdDyq8op8mwx0XTWcwgionnf.
The tls1.3 performance isn't as good as OpenSSL 1.1.x when testing at high concurrency.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: