Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusing error when using a struct literal as an iterator #47360

Closed
varkor opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Confusing error when using a struct literal as an iterator #47360

varkor opened this issue Jan 11, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-parser Area: The parsing of Rust source code to an AST. C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@varkor
Copy link
Member

varkor commented Jan 11, 2018

fn main() {
    for _ in std::ops::Range { start: 0, end: 10 } {}
}

// error: expected type, found `0`
//  --> src/main.rs:2:39
//   |
// 2 |     for _ in std::ops::Range { start: 0, end: 10 } {}
//   |                                       ^ expecting a type here because of type ascription

// error[E0423]: expected value, found struct `std::ops::Range`
//  --> src/main.rs:2:14
//   |
// 2 |     for _ in std::ops::Range { start: 0, end: 10 } {}
//   |              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ did you mean `std::ops::Range { /* fields */ }`?

It's confusing here, as it suggests using exactly what the user has typed. It should instead suggest the user parenthesise the struct literal.
(There's probably a reason this doesn't parse as-is, but if not, it seems like a nice case to handle.)

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

👍 on improving the diagnostics here.

There's probably a reason this doesn't parse as-is

The problem is that when the parser sees the { after Range it doesn't know whether it's a struct literal or the start of the loop body, and at parse time it has no idea that Range is a struct, not a constant.

@estebank estebank added A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-parser Area: The parsing of Rust source code to an AST. labels Jan 12, 2018
@jkordish jkordish added C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 10, 2018
Mark-Simulacrum added a commit to Mark-Simulacrum/rust that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2018
…cts, r=nikomatsakis

Suggest parentheses when a struct literal needs them

When writing a struct literal in an expression that expects a block to
be started afterwards (like an `if` statement), do not suggest using the
same struct literal:

```
did you mean `S { /* fields * /}`?
```

Instead, suggest surrounding the expression with parentheses:

```
did you mean `(S { /* fields * /})`?
```

Fix rust-lang#47360, rust-lang#50090. Leaving rust-lang#42982 open to come back to this problem with a better solution.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-diagnostics Area: Messages for errors, warnings, and lints A-parser Area: The parsing of Rust source code to an AST. C-enhancement Category: An issue proposing an enhancement or a PR with one. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants