New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is there a reason LitStr does not implement Peek? #559

Open

ModProg opened this issue Jun 11, 2023 · 1 comment

Labels

Contributor

ModProg commented Jun 11, 2023

No description provided.

udoprog added the question label

Collaborator

udoprog commented Jun 11, 2023

No, probably because it's very easy to peek for it using a token 😆

fn peek(p: &mut Peeker<'_>) -> bool {
  matches!(p.nth(0), K![str])
}

Feel free to implement peeking for all literals if you have the time!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment