You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Please vote on this issue by adding a 馃憤 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request. Searching for pre-existing feature requests helps us consolidate datapoints for identical requirements into a single place, thank you!
Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment.
Describe the user story execution_order_group enforces a defined progression for both plan and apply operations. While this is critical for failing on apply errors in an environment-progressive deployment during apply, it is not always needed for plans. In setups which have a lot of different execution order groups, plans may end up taking quite some time.
Describe the solution you'd like
Specific workflow steps should be able to be configure to adhere to or opt out of respecting the execution_order_group parameter on projects.
Describe the drawbacks of your solution
N/A
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Community Note
Describe the user story
execution_order_group
enforces a defined progression for both plan and apply operations. While this is critical for failing on apply errors in an environment-progressive deployment during apply, it is not always needed for plans. In setups which have a lot of different execution order groups, plans may end up taking quite some time.Describe the solution you'd like
Specific workflow steps should be able to be configure to adhere to or opt out of respecting the execution_order_group parameter on projects.
Describe the drawbacks of your solution
N/A
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: