Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Alternative to @rubygems_status on Twitter #4552

Open
andyw8 opened this issue Mar 24, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Alternative to @rubygems_status on Twitter #4552

andyw8 opened this issue Mar 24, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@andyw8
Copy link

andyw8 commented Mar 24, 2024

Since https://twitter.com/rubygems_status is no longer viewable unless logged in to Twitter, can this information be shared in another way? For example on Mastodon or Bluesky.

@andyw8 andyw8 added the feature label Mar 24, 2024
@simi
Copy link
Member

simi commented Mar 24, 2024

Hello @andyw8. Status is currently available at https://status.rubygems.org/. Does that work for you? Link to this page is little hidden at the RubyGems.org footer.

@simi
Copy link
Member

simi commented Mar 25, 2024

Is there link to https://twitter.com/rubygems_status anywhere on rubygems.org? 🤔 I did quick check and there is no reference to this link at rubygems.org and guides.rubygems.org. But maybe I have just missed it.

@andyw8
Copy link
Author

andyw8 commented Mar 25, 2024

It's linked from https://status.rubygems.org but it seems the Twitter feed includes updates that wouldn't appear on the status page, such as https://twitter.com/rubygems_status/status/1687571466618028033

@rubyFeedback
Copy link

Since https://twitter.com/rubygems_status is no longer viewable unless logged in to Twitter

This is, by the way, also affecting other projects outside of rubygems. For instance, on the
jruby homepage at https://www.jruby.org/, the twitter link there now says "Nothing to see
here - yet", so kind of nothing useful for the visitor. Not a great decision by Musk, IMO.

The twitter feed probably showed more information than status.rubygems.org, but I
don't remember. I guess it may be useful to specify what would be needed for a
"rubygems update" or something like that. I assume that rubygems.org already
has that information as-is, because it is published on twitter, as andyw8 pointed
out; so perhaps this could also be automatically published on rubygems.org
itself, if it was not written only manually (perhaps it could be a simple text
file that then gets automatically published on twitter and on rubygems.org).

The key idea here is, of course, to make it possible for people to get updates
and news about rubygems.org without depending on twitter. (I used to have
a twitter account, but I stopped using it when the censorship increased; I
think the news-feature is useful though, even if someone does not have a
twitter account so on that part I concur with andyw8.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants