Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Veracrypt #89

Open
Arcitec opened this issue Nov 18, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Veracrypt #89

Arcitec opened this issue Nov 18, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Arcitec
Copy link

Arcitec commented Nov 18, 2021

Please describe why this package is not eligible for Fedora ?

It's not packaged by Fedora because it contains non-free (patents) encryption algorithms.

RPM Fusion section: nonfree

Is this software redistributable ?

It's open source software which is being redistributed by tons of distributions already: https://pkgs.org/search/?q=veracrypt

Is this software an alternate version of a Fedora provided package ?

There is no Fedora package for Veracrypt.

Additional context

Veracrypt is the continuation of the very popular open source encryption software (Truecrypt), which has had multiple source code audits and is therefore widely trusted by the FOSS community. It allows you to create extremely strongly encrypted containers, which are portable to other operating systems (i.e. Mac and Windows).

It's a shame that it doesn't exist in Fedora itself due to patents. There are some untrusted people running private versions on COPR but for sensitive software like this, they can't be trusted.

The Fedora package of Veracrypt needs to be from a trusted source, which means either Fedora itself (which it can't), or you - RPM Fusion.

It seems like it would be a perfect fit for RPM Fusion.

@kwizart
Copy link
Member

kwizart commented Sep 18, 2023

Well, if anyone wants to volunteer to maintain in in rpmfusion-nonfree:
See also https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors

Now "serious Linux Folk" are using luks to encrypt natively in Linux. So I'm not sure why anyone still use it (beyond cross plate-form compatibility, which is nuts).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants