You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is a bit on the side of the technical matters, but I find it odd that ropensci hosts this (nice) package while a multimillion-dollar company is not listed among the financial contributors (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qualtRics/). Sure, open source projects might be harmed if no longer voluntary and there would need to be no string attached - but I think in this case everyone would benefit from it (package users, Qualtrics, maintainers)?
P.S. I am not referring to myself as a recipient.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
One way that Qualtrics the company does support the maintenance of this package is by giving me (the maintainer) a free Qualtrics account with pretty much everything (all features) turned on. Super glad to have that!
That's nice, though I think you deserve more. If they provided a month's salary you could perhaps attract more assistance from the other contributors? (I know you are busy yourself with Posit and sending me hex-stickers) ;) But seriously, I will plead with our customer care person to see if strings can be pulled.
This is a bit on the side of the technical matters, but I find it odd that ropensci hosts this (nice) package while a multimillion-dollar company is not listed among the financial contributors (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/qualtRics/). Sure, open source projects might be harmed if no longer voluntary and there would need to be no string attached - but I think in this case everyone would benefit from it (package users, Qualtrics, maintainers)?
P.S. I am not referring to myself as a recipient.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: