Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should aggregation of simulated data use quantile_cens()? #81

Open
billdenney opened this issue May 17, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Should aggregation of simulated data use quantile_cens()? #81

billdenney opened this issue May 17, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@billdenney
Copy link
Contributor

It seems like simulated data should generally go through the equivalent transformations as observed data. For that reason, I think that it makes sense to use quantile_cens() instead of the regular quantile() function. The benefit would be that simulated data would have the same censoring at the LLOQ or ULOQ as observed.

What do you think?

Relevant code is in calc_vpc_continuous.R:

https://github.com/billdenney/vpc/blob/ccbc2474ba5e47cd48db84201338fd0749ab5a1f/R/calc_vpc_continuous.R#L16-L24

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant