You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems like simulated data should generally go through the equivalent transformations as observed data. For that reason, I think that it makes sense to use quantile_cens() instead of the regular quantile() function. The benefit would be that simulated data would have the same censoring at the LLOQ or ULOQ as observed.
It seems like simulated data should generally go through the equivalent transformations as observed data. For that reason, I think that it makes sense to use
quantile_cens()
instead of the regularquantile()
function. The benefit would be that simulated data would have the same censoring at the LLOQ or ULOQ as observed.What do you think?
Relevant code is in
calc_vpc_continuous.R
:https://github.com/billdenney/vpc/blob/ccbc2474ba5e47cd48db84201338fd0749ab5a1f/R/calc_vpc_continuous.R#L16-L24
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: