You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure that it is a bug, maybe shall be RFF
When I'm using the subj command like "${pass} = Generate Random String 8-20 [LETTERS][NUMBERS]#*%-_.@!", it fails to create strong passwords from defined chars range because there is no way to make these ranges obligatory to include (numbers may be not included in generated strings)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This keyword simply picks characters from the specified set, there's currently no way to configure that certain characters must always appear. We could enhance the keyword to make such configuration possible, but we first needed to design how it should work. Do you have any ideas?
For the record, I don't consider this limitation a bug. The keyword works exactly as designed, but it certainly could be enhanced to be even more powerful.
Maybe to use the RegEx syntax or a simplified one, like ${pass} = Generate Random String 8-20 [LETTERS][NUMBERS:1,1][#:1,2][*%-_.@!]" where (:n,x) n= min number of occurrences, x= first allowed place of occurrence
Hello!
I'm not sure that it is a bug, maybe shall be RFF
When I'm using the subj command like "${pass} = Generate Random String 8-20 [LETTERS][NUMBERS]#*%-_.@!", it fails to create strong passwords from defined chars range because there is no way to make these ranges obligatory to include (numbers may be not included in generated strings)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: