Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop support for old Garfield versions #41

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lobis
Copy link
Member

@lobis lobis commented Mar 24, 2022

Large lobis 124

Related to #40.

Nothing should change for the user if you use a recent version of Garfield.

After this PR, we should remove the file FindGarfieldOld.cmake from the cmake dir in the framework, as its no longer needed, but it won't cause any issues either.

@lobis lobis linked an issue Mar 24, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@lobis lobis self-assigned this Mar 24, 2022
@@ -47,7 +41,7 @@ class TRestDetectorGarfieldDriftProcess : public TRestEventProcess {
TRestDetectorHitsEvent* fInputHitsEvent; //!
TRestDetectorHitsEvent* fOutputHitsEvent; //!

#if defined USE_Garfield
#if defined REST_GARFIELD
Copy link
Member

@jgalan jgalan Sep 9, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we keep USE_Garfield? It is done like that for other libraries.

We use REST_LIBRARY inside cmake, USE_LIBRARY inside the c++ codes. E.g. USE_SQL, USE_MPFR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Drop support for old Garfield versions
3 participants