We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Current Implementation uses the __class__.__name__ attribute
__class__.__name__
render-engine/src/render_engine/_base_object.py
Lines 19 to 25 in 9df89d0
If there is a content_path defined, would it be better to use the filename instead.
content_path
This would solve a the issue of overwritting files in a collection when no title is provided.
I would also be okay with raising warnings for this case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When branches are created from issues, their pull requests are automatically linked.
Current Implementation uses the
__class__.__name__
attributerender-engine/src/render_engine/_base_object.py
Lines 19 to 25 in 9df89d0
If there is a
content_path
defined, would it be better to use the filename instead.This would solve a the issue of overwritting files in a collection when no title is provided.
I would also be okay with raising warnings for this case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: