Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

Use influxDB instead of MySql for timeseries [V2 Feature Request] #154

Open
cjelsa opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

Use influxDB instead of MySql for timeseries [V2 Feature Request] #154

cjelsa opened this issue May 28, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@cjelsa
Copy link

cjelsa commented May 28, 2020

InfluxDB is a well performing Open Source DB which suits the timeseries functionality better than MySql. It might be an idea supporting this DB.

@noobymcnoob
Copy link

I use SQLite for my database which both stores and reads tick data, it's faster than Arctic which was designed for tick data.

Optimize after measuring, not before.

@FrithiofJensen
Copy link

I rather prefer the previous plans of using "PyStore" for data storage (or SQLite+SQLAlchemy, if it MUST be SQL, with SQLAlchemy is easier to use another database). I just do "daily" trading so for me it is an additional pain to keep database servers "spinning" 24/7.

@noobymcnoob
Copy link

noobymcnoob commented Jun 7, 2020 via email

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants