Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

withr 3.0.0 breaking gh actions #253

Closed
dsweber2 opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

withr 3.0.0 breaking gh actions #253

dsweber2 opened this issue Jan 17, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@dsweber2
Copy link

See for example this check run, though it has happened for several packages, not just our own @capnrefsmmat. The specific error is

  Error: 
  ! error in pak subprocess
  Caused by error in `verify_extracted_package(filename, pkg_cache)`:
  ! 
  '/tmp/RtmpdOhiV5/filea3032c36d0d/src/contrib/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ubuntu-22.04/4.3/withr_3.0.0.tar.gz'
  is not a valid binary, it is missing withr/Meta/package.rds.
  ---
  Backtrace:
  1. pak::lockfile_install(".github/pkg.lock")
  2. pak:::remote(function(...) { …
  3. err$throw(res$error)
  ---
  Subprocess backtrace:
   1. base::withCallingHandlers(cli_message = function(msg) { …
   2. get("lockfile_install_internal", asNamespace("pak"))(...)
   3. plan$install()
   4. pkgdepends::install_package_plan(plan, lib = private$library, num_workers = nw, …
   5. base::withCallingHandlers({ …
   6. pkgdepends:::handle_events(state, events)
   7. pkgdepends:::handle_event(state, i)
   8. proc$get_result()
   9. processx:::process_get_result(self, private)
  10. private$post_process()
  11. pkgdepends:::install_extracted_binary(filename, lib_cache, pkg_cache, lib, …
  12. pkgdepends:::verify_extracted_package(filename, pkg_cache)
  13. base::throw(pkg_error("{.path {filename}} is not a valid binary, it is missing {…
  14. | base::signalCondition(cond)
  15. global (function (e) …
@mitchellmanware
Copy link

I am experiencing the same issue during R-CMD check. Thank you for bringing up @dsweber2

@nickreich
Copy link

We were having this issue earlier this afternoon but when we re-run the actions now (after about 3:30pm ET) it seems to have been resolved.

@lionel-
Copy link
Member

lionel- commented Jan 18, 2024

Thanks, let me know if the problem resurfaces.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants