You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One can directly run the above code to produce a perpetual oscillation, which seems unphysical to me. If one suppresses either tone (e.g. by setting omegaR1 or omegaR2 to zero), or set the 2nd tone's detuning to zero (i.e. omega2 = omega0), one gets the expected damping behavior at large times.
Did I implement this physics correctly? Or is qutip being weird?
Describe the Issue!
Not sure if it's a bug, but my qutip result seems unphysical to me: it appears that I got some perpetual oscillation in a dissipative system.
What I modeled is a TLS driven by two tones, i.e.:
In addition, the TLS has a spontaneous emission rate$\Gamma_{21}$ .
To implement the above system, I used the following code (fully time-dependent, no rotating-wave approximation):
One can directly run the above code to produce a perpetual oscillation, which seems unphysical to me. If one suppresses either tone (e.g. by setting
omegaR1
oromegaR2
to zero), or set the 2nd tone's detuning to zero (i.e.omega2 = omega0
), one gets the expected damping behavior at large times.Did I implement this physics correctly? Or is qutip being weird?
Finally, my system info:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: