Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Terminology for m_ops in stochastic solvers #2212

Open
BenjaminDAnjou opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Terminology for m_ops in stochastic solvers #2212

BenjaminDAnjou opened this issue Aug 11, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@BenjaminDAnjou
Copy link

BenjaminDAnjou commented Aug 11, 2023

Describe the Issue!

I noticed some terminology used in the QuTip documentation that I think is not quite accurate.

The description of "m_ops" in the stochastic solver options states:

List of operators representing the measurement operators.

However, it is clear from the example given here that "m_ops" represents the observable being measured and not the measurement operator.

The distinction is that the term "measurement operator" usually refers to an (efficient) quantum operation that brings a pure state to a pure state. The measurement operators are the operators that generate the stochastic evolution and are akin to "sc_ops", not to "m_ops".

The operators "m_ops" used by the stochastic solver define the POVM elements, i.e., they define the probabilities of measurement outcomes. This is not the same as a measurement operator.

For more detail, see the first chapter of the standard textbook by Wiseman and Milburn.

P.S. Note that Wiseman also calls the POVM elements "effects", which I think is dreadfully confusing. But I think there is pretty universal agreement that "measurement operator" should refer to the quantum maps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant