Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Implement the BoseHubbardModel #959

Open
mrossinek opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Implement the BoseHubbardModel #959

mrossinek opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request

Comments

@mrossinek
Copy link
Member

What should we add?

Once we have a BosonicOperator (see #958), we can implement the BoseHubbardModel analogously to the FermiHubbardModel.
@mrossinek mrossinek added type: feature request New feature or request on hold Can not fix yet labels Nov 14, 2022
@mrossinek mrossinek added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Nov 14, 2022
@mrossinek mrossinek modified the milestones: 0.6.0, 0.7.0 Jan 27, 2023
@mrossinek mrossinek removed this from the 0.7.0 milestone Sep 6, 2023
@mrossinek mrossinek removed the on hold Can not fix yet label Sep 14, 2023
@RasmitDevkota
Copy link

I'm interested in working on this issue and have started on it! One question - would the chemical potential parameter be a complex number? I don't fully understand why the hopping and onsite interaction parameters are complex, so I am unsure whether this also applies to the chemical potential.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
type: feature request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@RasmitDevkota @mrossinek