Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is this project still maintained? #23

Open
beenje opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 16 comments
Open

Is this project still maintained? #23

beenje opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 16 comments

Comments

@beenje
Copy link

beenje commented Dec 14, 2022

Hello,

I'd like to know the status of the project. Last version on pypi is 1.3.4 (from 2019).
There is a fork https://github.com/spectrochempy/brukeropusreader with several tags. There is a 1.3.9 version available.

Are you willing to take the changes from this fork?
Or would you consider transferring the pypi project to @spectrochempy? I have no link with this organisation, so I actually don't know if they are interested.

As a user it would be nice to have a maintained version on pypi.

@luukvandervelden
Copy link

luukvandervelden commented Jan 28, 2023

I do not have the answer to your question, but I do have an active fork in which I have merged almost all contributions of other forks that I could find on Github.
Are you by any chance also working on the code of brukeropusreader? Is there any functionality you are looking for?

If you find pypi to be outdated, you could always just clone a repository to your computer and then make a symbolic link of that repository in your python site-packages folder.

@beenje
Copy link
Author

beenje commented Feb 1, 2023

Hi! I'm not using it myself. Someone at my institute (MAX IV) wanted to use it.
I'd have liked to create an official package on conda-forge but this can only be done from the official source.

So yes, right now they just cloned the repo locally and installed from there but it's not great for reproducibility.
It would be nice if someone active would take over pypi.

If the original author doesn't answer, and if you are interested you could open an issue on pypi: https://peps.python.org/pep-0541/#how-to-request-a-name-transfer

@clemensgaahs
Copy link

I was looking for the functionality of reading files created by the process control. That was not supported by the repo here, but by your one, so thanks a lot @luukvandervelden!

It would be correct to say that this repository is not active, while your one is clearly more advanced (for everyone having the same problems as I had).

@luukvandervelden
Copy link

Thanks @beenje, I will take a look at your suggestion

@philipp-baumann
Copy link

Has somebody yet contacted qed.ai by mail (Wiliam Wu is the co-founder)?

@luukvandervelden
Copy link

I will contact them this afternoon @philipp-baumann, will let you know

@philipp-baumann
Copy link

@luukvandervelden do you have any updates from qed.ai ?

@luukvandervelden
Copy link

luukvandervelden commented Mar 19, 2023 via email

@philipp-baumann
Copy link

Nothing yet, I’ve just forwarded the mail to William. Hopefully he’ll respond 🙏🏻

Op 19 mrt. 2023 om 12:00 heeft Philipp Baumann @.***> het volgende geschreven:  @luukvandervelden do you have any updates from qed.ai ? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

thanks. I'm sure they will.

@luukvandervelden
Copy link

Willam @willywutang, @tdyczek Tomasz?

@mlazowik
Copy link
Member

mlazowik commented Apr 7, 2023

Hi, we're looking at options internally and will let you know soon. Sorry for the wait!

@mlazowik
Copy link
Member

mlazowik commented Apr 11, 2023

As the first step we're tweaking licensing, see #25

In the meantime, @fernandezc – would @spectrochempy be interested in taking over maintenance, including the pypi package? We're potentially open to that, as long as our credit is preserved (AFAIK the license enforces that either way).

@fernandezc
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

@spectrochempy is not a big organization (only two maintainers at the moment)
but it is true that we need updated versions of brukeropusreader in pypi and conda.
So we are eventually open to this, if it can be of service to the community.

@kvngvikram
Copy link

Hi all,

So, now, which fork should I be using ?
I am new to this, and can't track different commits and decide.

Thank you.

@fernandezc
Copy link
Contributor

Hi all,

So, now, which fork should I be using ? I am new to this, and can't track different commits and decide.

Thank you.

Hi,
I guess as long as qedsoftware hasn't decided to transfer maintenance to another fork, the only official one is this one, isn't it?

@joshduran
Copy link

I have recently published a python package that can both read binary OPUS files and communicate/control OPUS software. I believe it uses a more sophisticated algorithm for extracting data from OPUS files and should read most, if not all, files. Take a look here:

https://github.com/joshduran/brukeropus

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants