Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve usage of pykrige #14

Open
1 of 2 tasks
cchwala opened this issue Sep 6, 2017 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Improve usage of pykrige #14

cchwala opened this issue Sep 6, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@cchwala
Copy link
Contributor

cchwala commented Sep 6, 2017

There are several issues with the usage of pykrige

  • the version 1.3.1 which is the current one on pip and conda-forge, both seem to not correctly build the cython extension resulting in slow operation
  • cloning the repository and using pip install -e correctly installs the cython extensions
  • if using the windowd kriging option with nnear (which makes most sense for rainfall fields which can have very different semivariograms when interpolating over large area, e.g. like Germany) the results sometimes produce artifacts (possibly due to non-sense fits of the semivariogram) or pykrige even fails with a scipy.linalg error.

TODO:

  • Force usage of pykrige > 1.4.0 (solved now, because pykrige has new version on conda)
  • Catch errors if kriging fails or produces artifacts
@cchwala
Copy link
Contributor Author

cchwala commented Aug 26, 2018

pykrige is now available in version 1.4.0 on conda-forge. This caused a problem, see #40. But the C backend should now work.

@cchwala
Copy link
Contributor Author

cchwala commented Nov 7, 2022

I assume that we still do not catch the cases where kriging fails. Hence, I leave this issue open.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant