New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Planning] Geographic Features Refinement #9698
Comments
Let's keep this milestone, I"ll update it with this planning issue. Thanks! |
publiclab/leaflet-environmental-layers#121 I was wondering if spinning it out the component as Leaflet Plugin, would ease out our scripts and workflow. What are your thoughts about this @jywarren ? |
publiclab/leaflet-environmental-layers#480 Bumping this issue and planning to add to tasklist. Have we consider adding a guide/docs which doesn't require people to download/install things? Using CDNs like jsdelivr or unpkg. This would ease out for someone who is wanting to try it out without needing to externally add anything. |
I like this idea a lot! It'd be a nice output of the fellowship too! |
This sounds cool -- sure! One thing perhaps in terms of prioritization is that the current map at https://publiclab.org/map is really not as useful as we'd hope it to be. I wonder if it's worth a brainstorm of ideas for how to make the experience better. Some ideas that occur to me:
What other ideas might we come up with? |
Great ideas here! These seem like ideal goals for the Fellowship on Geographic Features. +1! It has occurred to me that in the future we could think about:
also for later -- cartography. The fun stuff :) |
This prompt would be on the /map page itself? If so, it could mirror the logic and style of the button we show on the dashboard, which shows "Add your location" if you haven't yet. I like this!
I think we could, but we often request location as part of the blurred location popup itself, when we do so to save that location to ones' profile. So we would have to think about whether it's redundant to ask here, or if we can clearly and simply describe how this "request your location" prompt is not /saving/ the location, but merely /displaying/ it for you, and so, relatively, preserving your privacy? Or is that distinction not really worth trying to explain vs. just getting people to input their blurred location -- does it present too much possible confusion? Thanks! Good ideas, happy to dig into them further as well! |
Also noting this issue affecting display of people! publiclab/leaflet-blurred-location-display#123 |
I realised, I haven't noted down my progress in this planning issue. Regarding Github Actions, the workflow lies at daemon1024/leaflet-environmental-layers#6 and seems to be working fine. I have started working on the web form which will take the input and in-turn run the above github action . https://daemon1024.github.io/leaflet-environmental-layers/example/form.html Most of the progress lies inside my personal fork since they are awaiting movement in publiclab/leaflet-environmental-layers#531 which is blocked by publiclab/leaflet-environmental-layers#532 I think my next step would be to start investigating the PL People API while make the above listed items slowly progress into the main repo. What do you think about this? Thank You. |
Hi @daemon1024 - this is looking really nice. I just gave it a try and made screenshots which could be used in documentation. daemon1024/leaflet-environmental-layers#12 Agreed on PL People API which is /super/ slow right now. I'll also look in on the Cypress thing! |
Haven't referenced some of the recent things I have worked on :) Only show popups when there are markers in the region:
Show people in a region as a bulleted list within the popup
Refactor and Organise Source of truth of layers for OneLinerCode LEL Google Deprecation of Sheets API v3 |
/map
tagLocations
#9946tagLocations
#9946Succeeds #1416
This is currently broad planning points for the project. I will be detailing out, break it further, adding more relevant tasks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: