You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Annotations relate IRIs to IRIs. However, I see no way to create an annotation from an IRI that isn't otherwise typed to be an individual, property, or class. In addition, pure IRI to IRI relations authored outside of Protege seem to be invisible. The usage tab of the annotation property so used does not show the relationship between the untyped IRIs. Example below.
This request is to
to add a view that shows untyped IRIs, allows new untyped IRIs to be added to an ontology, allows annotations on them to be made, and which supports the usage tab.
to fix usage so that when viewing an annotation property, untyped IRI to untyped IRI annotations are visible.
to allow the selection of untyped IRIs when adding an annotation value. Currently the only way that this can be done is to type in the IRI.
Have untyped IRIs show up in search.
As with entities, display of untyped IRIs should respect the rendering settings.
Annotations relate IRIs to IRIs. However, I see no way to create an annotation from an IRI that isn't otherwise typed to be an individual, property, or class. In addition, pure IRI to IRI relations authored outside of Protege seem to be invisible. The usage tab of the annotation property so used does not show the relationship between the untyped IRIs. Example below.
This request is to
As with entities, display of untyped IRIs should respect the rendering settings.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: