Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for untyped IRIs #1157

Open
alanruttenberg opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Support for untyped IRIs #1157

alanruttenberg opened this issue Jul 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@alanruttenberg
Copy link

Annotations relate IRIs to IRIs. However, I see no way to create an annotation from an IRI that isn't otherwise typed to be an individual, property, or class. In addition, pure IRI to IRI relations authored outside of Protege seem to be invisible. The usage tab of the annotation property so used does not show the relationship between the untyped IRIs. Example below.

This request is to

  • to add a view that shows untyped IRIs, allows new untyped IRIs to be added to an ontology, allows annotations on them to be made, and which supports the usage tab.
  • to fix usage so that when viewing an annotation property, untyped IRI to untyped IRI annotations are visible.
  • to allow the selection of untyped IRIs when adding an annotation value. Currently the only way that this can be done is to type in the IRI.
  • Have untyped IRIs show up in search.

As with entities, display of untyped IRIs should respect the rendering settings.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="urn:lsw:ontology:f#"
     xml:base="urn:lsw:ontology:f"
     xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
     xmlns:example="http://example.com/">
    <owl:Ontology rdf:about="urn:lsw:ontology:f"/>
    <owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://example.com/p"/>
    <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/a">
        <example:p rdf:resource="http://example.com/b"/>
    </rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant