You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.
I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of Polars.
Reproducible example
Unfortunately, I can't provide a minimal example, as I deal with large amounts of data I can't share, and this problem is only visible in such cases.
Log output
No response
Issue description
I noticed that after upgrading to polars 0.20.24 my large query started getting killed by OOM, on a 2TB machine. Previously, the query worked fine, consuming less than 200GB. The runs look like this:
Is there a minimal example that shows a memory increase? I do need something with syntetic data to be able to understand what happens. It doesn't have to OOM, just be a similar query.
Checks
Reproducible example
Unfortunately, I can't provide a minimal example, as I deal with large amounts of data I can't share, and this problem is only visible in such cases.
Log output
No response
Issue description
I noticed that after upgrading to polars 0.20.24 my large query started getting killed by OOM, on a 2TB machine. Previously, the query worked fine, consuming less than 200GB. The runs look like this:
The query looks like:
If, per #15795, I put
collect
before.filter
inopps
, I get OOM even for 0.20.16.Expected behavior
I would expect that the recent versions finish without OOM.
Installed versions
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: