You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No, but it would be useful to provide such API that someone can do remeshing with customized target lengths.
Describe the solution you'd like
The API shall be named as custom_remeshing (compatible with uniform_remehsing and adaptive_remeshing)
Hi, thanks for your suggestion. I had use cases for custom sizing fields in the past as well, definitely something to think about. Marking it as enhancement.
Hi, thanks for considering my suggestion, recently, I just found another paper focusing on remeshing, it follows a similar pipeline, while the most different part of this method is vertex interpolation based on a local cubic-bezier surface (not simple along some edge), so if you want to improve your remeshing methods more someday, I think it would be an easy-implement method based on current APIs. here is the paper for your reference in the future.
Dapogny, C., Dobrzynski, C., & Frey, P. (2014). Three-dimensional adaptive domain remeshing, implicit domain meshing, and applications to free and moving boundary problems. Journal of computational physics, 262, 358-378.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
No, but it would be useful to provide such API that someone can do remeshing with customized target lengths.
Describe the solution you'd like
The API shall be named as custom_remeshing (compatible with uniform_remehsing and adaptive_remeshing)
Describe alternatives you've considered
None
Additional context
pmp-library/src/pmp/algorithms/SurfaceRemeshing.cpp
Line 34 in 4d52809
pmp-library/src/pmp/algorithms/SurfaceRemeshing.cpp
Line 62 in 4d52809
So, what do you think about this feature request?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: