Performance advantages / disadvantages

[FractalHQ]

Hey there!

Have any of the improvement in this library been incorporated into Three? Or is does this library still out-perform the latest version of Three's builtins?

If so, are there any performance comparisons / benchmarks out there that demonstrate the differences in performance?

I'm asking because I plan on porting a large postprocessing stack that I've built to this library, but it will be quite a lot of work so I would like to weigh the pros and cons beforehand.

Thanks in advance!!

[vanruesc]

Hi,

Have any of the improvement in this library been incorporated into Three?

Passes in three have gained consistent setSize and dispose methods, but other than that, no.

Or does this library still out-perform the latest version of Three's builtins?

I would say so, yes.

If so, are there any performance comparisons / benchmarks

https://pmndrs.github.io/postprocessing/public/demo/#performance

Check/uncheck merge effects to see the impact on pixel throughput, especially on weaker hardware like iGPUs and mobile devices.

I'm asking because I plan on porting a large postprocessing stack that I've built to this library

I'm currently working on the next major release of postprocessing which involves some breaking changes, but the concept of passes and effects will largely stay the same. There will be a migration guide for v7 to make the transition easier.

[FractalHQ]

Amazing! I'm incredibly excited for v7 from what I've read so far! I'll certainly be following it closely 🙏. Thanks!!

[makc]

Three's builtins

they arent builtins, they are examples - normal three.js build does not have any postprocessing