AoS 0.76 support

[feikname]

[NotAFile]

What does this require? Didn't pyspades have .76 support? Is it even worth it to use .76 when nobody uses it? Should we not just build on .75 instead?

[feikname]

@NotAFile PySnip (in which piqueserver is based) has 2 releases available: 0.75 and 0.76. Furthemore, there are 7 different branches in the PySnip repository, including a master and a protocol076, which differ from one another. I'm not sure if 0.76 is supported by piqueserver currently, but the fact that protocol076 branch of PySnip differs from its master, and we are based on that very same master branch, leads me to believe that 0.76 is currently not supported.

Regarding 0.76 being worth it, I think not. As you said: almost no one uses it. That's why I included the issue in the Someday milestone, it's a just in case issue for when we have already solved the other issues and can work on nice extra features.

[noway]

Yeah 0.76 is a strange patch in AOS history. It's not very popular either

[NotAFile]

unfortunately not :/

As I said, since I think the plan is to slowly Embrace, Extend, Extinguish the original .75 protocol, I'm not sure adding .76 makes any sense at all.

[NotAFile]

I've changed my mind on this. I think 0.76 would make sense, especially since we need to figure out a way to deal with serveral versions anway.

Much of that work (dynamically handling packet numbers etc) needs to be done either way, and 0.76 support is a nice goal on the way I guess.

[NotAFile]

@iamgreaser made this script that condenses all of the changes required in one place: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iamgreaser/pysnip/master/feature_server/scripts/malsa076.py

As suspected, most of these are things that are not currently cleanly switchable at runtime.