Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider switching to ubuntu as default base image for runners #2022

Open
ScottGuymer opened this issue May 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Open

Consider switching to ubuntu as default base image for runners #2022

ScottGuymer opened this issue May 8, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested stale:exempt

Comments

@ScottGuymer
Copy link
Member

Ubuntu is often the only supported Linux distro by the public GH runners and several the available actions only work on ubuntu.

Should we consider switching over to using ubuntu by default?

@ScottGuymer ScottGuymer added the question Further information is requested label May 8, 2022
@npalm npalm pinned this issue May 9, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Jun 8, 2022
@Taytay
Copy link

Taytay commented Jun 8, 2022

I am new to this repo (thank you for creating and open sourcing it!) so this is newbie feedback, but I find myself wanting this to be as close to a drop-in replacement for Github's runners as possible. As such, I would love it if there was an easy way to get a runner that looks and operates just like theirs does, except in my infrastructure. I would think that basing the default runner on Ubuntu, at the very least, would be a great step in that direction, and would likely lead to less friction down the road. (Admitedly, I don't know what the implications/downsides are.)

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Jun 9, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 9, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 30 days. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@rlove
Copy link
Contributor

rlove commented Oct 15, 2022

We build Amazon Image Builder to spin up custom images on Amazon Linux.

The reason I chose Amazon Linux is that most of my employers' servers & containers are Amazon Linux based.

However, given that I am open to this idea, as I thought the same thing initially.

@npalm npalm unpinned this issue Aug 5, 2023
@crohr
Copy link

crohr commented Dec 21, 2023

I am new to this repo (thank you for creating and open sourcing it!) so this is newbie feedback, but I find myself wanting this to be as close to a drop-in replacement for Github's runners as possible. As such, I would love it if there was an easy way to get a runner that looks and operates just like theirs does, except in my infrastructure. I would think that basing the default runner on Ubuntu, at the very least, would be a great step in that direction, and would likely lead to less friction down the road. (Admitedly, I don't know what the implications/downsides are.)

@Taytay If you want 1-1 workflow compatibility with GitHub, I would suggest you look at https://github.com/runs-on/runs-on. Official runner images are automatically published as AMI images for AWS and can be used as a drop-in replacement for your workflows.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested stale:exempt
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants