Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

After YouTube updated its site, some Vimium shortcuts are unreadable #2363

Closed
nick-s-b opened this issue Dec 7, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Comments

@nick-s-b
Copy link

nick-s-b commented Dec 7, 2016

Hi all,
I've used Vimium for a while without any issues and one of the things I did on YT is to set player into full-screen mode by hitting the "f" key and then picked the proper shortcut key. However, after the recent update, YT player now looks like this when I hit the "f" key:

yt mess

and it's impossible to tell what the proper key is for full-screen.

Unfortunately, the full-screen key under YT is "f" key so when I disabled it, Vimium doesn't open links anymore.

Any idea why YT is messed up so much now? Thanks!

@smblott-github
Copy link
Collaborator

@nick-s-b... I'm going to guess it's LD, but that doesn't answer your question. Unfortunately, I don't see YT the same, so it's difficult to figure out what's going on...

snapshot

As a workaround, if you have...

map <c-]> passNextKey

Then <c-]> f should get you full screen mode too. And that's better in that the keys you have to hit are predictable.

@nick-s-b
Copy link
Author

nick-s-b commented Dec 8, 2016

Thank you for replying @smblott-github ! That worked well... now I can bypass Vimium easily.

BTW, how did you change your links to numbers?

@sco-tt
Copy link
Contributor

sco-tt commented Jan 12, 2017

@nick-s-b

Vimium Options -> Advanced Options -> Use the link's name and numbers for link-hint filtering

@bora89
Copy link

bora89 commented Aug 18, 2017

I found next short cut more handy:

map e passNextKey

So you would press e then f.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants