New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up openInNewSpace, openInSpace, showSpace:, etc. #431
Comments
Additionally, we can rename to |
showInSpace and inSpace are ok for me. |
@Ducasse what do you think? |
Trying to get smart :)
Now why would we need place child in space because we have addChild: So may be we should name them |
Thanks... But do you prefer |
Bahhh, we can also discuss if "show" is the good term... I've just discovered that after "hide", then "show" doesn't work :-/ s := BlSpace new.
s show.
s hide.
s show.
Reported here: #434 |
Let's include in the fix for this issue this (unsent) method in
|
Additional input for the discussion: First. There are separate testing methods for the concepts of being visible and being opened: s := BlSpace new.
{ s isOpened. s isVisible }. "#(false false)"
s show.
{ s isOpened. s isVisible }. "#(true true)"
s hide.
{ s isOpened. s isVisible }. "#(true false)" Second. The comment of
|
I propose to deprecate this method I added to
BlElement
(if I remember well):In favor of:
It can be the opposite, too. But no reason to have both.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: